Results 21 to 22 of 22
Thread: Question on DRS .
-
18th November 2015, 10:05 #21
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,607
- Like
- 28
- Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
It sounds like you want to change the rules to give Hamilton a better chance to win a race that's already finished.
Backmarkers have always affected battles for the higher positions. Sometimes it's the guy in front who gets the advantage, sometimes the guy behind. The introduction of DRS didn't change that, and neither would removing DRS for passing backmarkers.
- Likes: N4D13 (18th November 2015)
-
18th November 2015, 13:54 #22
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,414
- Like
- 492
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
But for the "win a race that's already finished" bit , I mostly agree .
My point is , though , that Lewis would likely have had a much better chance to get close enough to Nico to attempt a pass in the pre-DRS era .
Backmarkers have always represented an opportunity in this regard .
But , i believe it to be less so now , and also believe it an easy fix .
That's all .
I don't care who the guy behind is , but I want him to be able to push the guy ahead into a mistake as he gets through traffic .
A shame it seems there will be no Penmachno.....And if they want a proper sting in the tail, how about linking Alwen & Brenig, as seen on RallyGB in 2018? Might need a road closure, which is why it...
British & Irish Championships...