Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Monitored by NSA
    Posts
    2,968
    Like
    32
    Liked 39 Times in 33 Posts
    Is that a prediction you're making?
    FIDO - Forget It, Drive On

  2. #22
    Senior Member kfzmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Paxton, IL
    Posts
    728
    Like
    54
    Liked 33 Times in 30 Posts
    Patiently remaining hopeful.....
    Form is Temporary, Class is Permanent

  3. #23
    Senior Member Storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    18,997
    Like
    237
    Liked 192 Times in 174 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by kfzmeister View Post
    ...Honda
    One can't expect for them to remain in this state forever, right?

    We thought that about Toyota too back in the early 2000s
    Tito Vilanova = :champion:

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,744
    Like
    145
    Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
    Well, at least Alonso now knows how Jacques Villeneuve felt in 1999. "Welcome to the club!"

    At least in BAR's defence - they had old outdated Supertec engines in '99, and once BAR got all-new Honda engines (sounds familiar?) for 2000 they were firmly in upper midfield scoring consistent points.

    Yeah, Honda should have the ability to be at least in midfield. Let's say where currently Red Bull-Renault is. Though Red Bull (and Renault) itself may easily improve as well. Reaching top level and podiums is another matter though. Even reaching BMW Sauber level (twice third in WCC) takes some doing.

    But usually in F1 there are only 1-2 teams doing most of the winning at the time, and others battling only for scraps. The only question is - who will these be at any period of time?!
    Last edited by jens; 29th July 2015 at 13:56.

  5. Likes: AAReagles (29th July 2015)
  6. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,438
    Like
    14
    Liked 789 Times in 651 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jens View Post
    Yeah, Honda should have the ability to be at least in midfield. Let's say where currently Red Bull-Renault is.
    I dont think the Honda engine is running at full power yet. Hence, Mclaren have not been able to unleash the full potential of the chassis. Once they sort out the reliability issues, they would easily be in the mix well into the top end of the midfield. How far up the order is yet to be seen. Mclaren-Honda could well be a surprise in 2016.

    Things change very quickly in F1. Who ever thought Mercedes would ever beat Redbull to be world champions a few years back? I remember all that talk about Hamilton's move to Mercedes being daft. Here we are, Mercedes is king, Hamilton has won his 2nd drivers championship with Mercedes and most cannot see Maclaren-Honda ever winning a championship.
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 29th July 2015 at 22:54.

  7. Likes: AAReagles (29th July 2015),rjbetty (30th July 2015)
  8. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,744
    Like
    145
    Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
    I think Hamilton's move at the time made sense, because everyone knew new engine regulations would come in 2014, and that works teams would have an edge. Of course fans didn't grasp it, but I think it seemed an obvious argument to insiders. So there was a game-changer, which suited Mercedes, even if no-one could perfectly predict, how good Mercedes could be, and of course nobody expected McLaren to fall off so badly.

    So, what are the game-changers in 2017 technical regulations?

  9. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,438
    Like
    14
    Liked 789 Times in 651 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jens View Post
    So, what are the game-changers in 2017 technical regulations?
    It would depend on the conclusion from the talks about the future of F1. Based on some of the things that has been proposed so far, the status quo at the sharp end is looking like it is going to remain the same, with Ferrari edging much closer or on par with Mercedes. The typical F1 dominance cycle seems typically 4 to 6 years. And the rate at which Ferrari is catching the Mercedes and the rate of mistakes that Mercedes is doing, it probably may be less than 4 years of dominance. They may be marginally ahead in 2016, but l would expect Ferrari to be fully on par with the Merc in 2017 with Mclaren-Honda in the mix as well. We have to keep an eye on Redbull which could also storm to the front if Renault gives them a decent engine.

    This is also more likely because of the reduced pre-season testing, which is only 8 days and no in-season testing.

    The Redbull - Renault affair seem to be on its last leg. Particularly with the likelihood that Renault may be enticed to run their own works team. The Redbull team are unlikely to get the cream of the engines it has enjoyed in the past should Renault start their own team, hence they may be forced to look for engine elsewhere and may have a Mclaren-Honda experience where they disappear to the back of the grid while they transition to a new engine supplier.

    That said, everyone is quietly expecting a change at the front with Ferrari or possibly Maclaren-Honda stealing the show. It would take something special for this to happen and may depend on the changes introduced to specifications for 2017.
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 31st July 2015 at 22:10.

  10. #28
    Senior Member kfzmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Paxton, IL
    Posts
    728
    Like
    54
    Liked 33 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jens View Post

    So, what are the game-changers in 2017 technical regulations?
    This is what i found from as recently as early July of this year:

    ....The full list of measures outlined by the FIA is as follows: "Increased restrictions on driver aids and coaching received unanimous support and will be rapidly implemented, starting from this year's Belgian Grand Prix - with a particular emphasis on race starts - and in 2016. These measures will bring back the driver in full control of the car, enhancing races excitement and unpredictability.

    "Following the Austrian GP, an overhaul of the power unit penalties has been unanimously agreed and will be submitted to the F1 Commission via an express fax vote for an adoption at the World Motor Sport Council in Mexico City next week, together with changes to the exhaust system that will improve engine noise for 2016.

    "Furthermore, it was agreed to allow an extra power unit per driver in the first year to any new manufacturer entering the championship and, for the sake of fairness, the measure will apply retroactively to Honda for the 2015 season.
    Formula 1 title fight heads to Hamilton's stomping grounds
    Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team

    "Mandate has been given to the FIA and FOM to propose a comprehensive set of measures for power unit development and cost of supply, including full review of the token system, increase in race fuel allowance, limits on the usage of engine dynamometers etc.

    "Increased freedom of choice for tire compounds has been confirmed and the modalities are being finalized with Pirelli for 2016.

    "A new set of regulations aimed at achieving faster and more aggressive looking cars for 2017, to include wider cars and wheels, new wings and floor shape and significantly increased aerodynamic downforce has been outlined and is currently being assessed by the teams.

    "Several exciting and innovative changes to the qualifying and race weekend formats have also been discussed and are being evaluated by FIA and FOM for a 2016 introduction."
    Form is Temporary, Class is Permanent

  11. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,438
    Like
    14
    Liked 789 Times in 651 Posts
    "A new set of regulations aimed at achieving faster and more aggressive looking cars for 2017, to include wider cars and wheels, new wings and floor shape and significantly increased aerodynamic downforce has been outlined and is currently being assessed by the teams.
    Great post kfzmeister. It would seem 2017 is about the quality of the aero package each team can muster. the engine differentiation in performance would remain with Merc and Ferrari, hopefully Honda possibly producing the main entertainment. Chassis efficiency is going to be key.

    It would be great if most of the regulations introduced in 2016 carry through to 2107 as well, particularly restriction on driver aid and tyre choice for teams. With the new tyre regulations for 2017 of wider tyres etc, it is looking like Michelin may be the tyre supplier for 2017. If you ask for a honest opinion from the drivers, l am sure most would say they quietly dislike the Pirelli tyres.
    A new era of F1 is about to unfold in 2017. This would be great l think. It would be like the old times of wider cars, wider fat tyres, turbo engine and break neck raw speed. Now that is F1!
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 1st August 2015 at 11:24.

  12. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,744
    Like
    145
    Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
    Aerodynamics important in the 2017 regs?
    Then Red Bull must find a way to entice Newey back to full-time action then... Though James Key in the Toro Rosso seems pretty good too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •