Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Senior Member Duncan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Oregon, US
    Posts
    290
    Like
    372
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    ...and now Marussia is in administration as well. Unless additional investors show up, both will likely close their doors at the end of the season.

    Bagwan makes a good point, though. With Caterham not showing up, what's the benefit of Marussia spending the money to go? Based on Bernie's remarks last week, I don't think there's a penalty for them in not participating for two races, so there's no benefit to them in terms of standing by showing up.

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    3,186
    Like
    1
    Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
    Marussia had to get special dispensation from Bernie to miss Austin and Brazil, so there has to be some rule that you don't get paid unless you make all the races. that, or some sort of other penalty. Otherwise, why would they need permission?

    Go to the second paragraph.............. http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/ma...tration-report

  3. #33
    Senior Member Duncan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Oregon, US
    Posts
    290
    Like
    372
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    Marussia had to get special dispensation from Bernie to miss Austin and Brazil, so there has to be some rule that you don't get paid unless you make all the races. that, or some sort of other penalty. Otherwise, why would they need permission?

    Go to the second paragraph.............. http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/ma...tration-report
    Right - that was what I was alluding to in Bernie's remarks. I wasn't meaning to imply that anybody could miss those two races, but rather that both Caterham and Marussia have been given that dispensation. Given that they have permission to miss those two races without penalty, why would they not?

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,744
    Like
    145
    Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
    Does missing a few races mean Marussia loses its 9th place in WCC and doesn't get the money? Because Marussia would not have fulfilled its contract to run all races. It's a pity, considering Marussia finally had some success, scored points, and is about to outscore even Sauber.

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,032
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
    According this story Marussia, as we know it, is dead and buried: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/29954250

    Not really a surprise they struggled to find a buyer. But no appearance in the final GP it seems...so Sauber will move up a place in standings
    :champion: WRC3 championship, WRC4 championship, WRC4 PCWRC, WRC4 ERC
    Winner - TRD2 Bathurst:burnout:

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,088
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Wow, the administrators didn't give much time to find a buyer for Marussia. A great shame, especially those two points from Bianchi will go to waste. I guess someone may now buy the assets and resurrect the team in that way?

    Meanwhile, Caterham's administrators launched a crowd-funding project to make the Abu-Dhabi grand prix: https://www.crowdcube.com/caterham/

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    811
    Like
    7
    Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
    When would Marussia have got their prize money? If it was before the end of the year, daft to quit now when keeping a skeleton company going would have paid the debts, at least.

    As for Caterham, they're actually almost a quarter of the way there, which surprises me.
    They WAY underpriced all the limited car bits and so on, though. Went far too quickly.
    Last edited by Somebody; 8th November 2014 at 18:07.

  8. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,088
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    Meanwhile, Caterham's administrators launched a crowd-funding project to make the Abu-Dhabi grand prix: https://www.crowdcube.com/caterham/
    Come on guys, dig deep.. they're nearly half way there...

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    There's an interesting piece on the James Allen site about how Crowdcube is linked to the accountancy firm that's administering Caterham, with the clear implication that this crowd-funding effort is half aimed at promoting Crowdcube. With this, cleaners being made directors, disputes over who owns the team and who's been paid what, there's so much dodgy business going on that maybe it would be best to just euthanise the outfit now.

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,088
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Allegedly there is a serious party interested in the team: http://m.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/318...d-in-caterham/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •