Thread: Was ending the IRC a mistake ?
-
8th February 2015, 19:26 #71
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Posts
- 35
- Like
- 0
- Liked 12 Times in 4 Posts
Facts ?
The facts are simple...
Bernardo Sousa sponsors are portuguese. What he said was simple... He gets more covereage from portuguese press and media competing in WRC than in the ERC... The same for many others in europe....
Live TV is not all..... Because of social media, the Live TV factor is not so important as it was before....
-
8th February 2015, 19:47 #72
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,386
- Like
- 2,011
- Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
There has to be a real incentive to choose ERC vs WRC if you have a R5, R3 or R2, and are aiming for the top in rallying.
in IRC you had an own car class, fresh management, and teams that chose drivers from IRC.
FIA need to get some real winner incentives implemented in ERC to get the talents to chose ERC over WRC as their place to grow!
Maybe also invent the new R4 class, maybe something like this:
http://www.omse.se/?page_id=186
-
8th February 2015, 19:57 #73
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Posts
- 35
- Like
- 0
- Liked 12 Times in 4 Posts
One simple example..
Last year Rally Liepāja topic had +400 posts. 2015 Rally Liepāja topic only has 280... That's a big drop. Maybe less people on the forum ? No interest in this rally ? Maybe yes maybe not... But things are not looking good
-
8th February 2015, 20:05 #74
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 3,585
- Like
- 1,913
- Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
What sponsors for Sousa? A football club and rally-team of Tamrazov?
Another simple fact is that Peugeot Portugal always chose IRC/ERC over SWRC/WRC2.
IMO the issue in ERC now is that there are not enough events that are big enough (in their own country and in international reputation). Events like Liepaja and Ireland don't attract enough local drivers and spectators, ERC is at it's "peak" in events like Ypres and Barum where a big number of national drivers takes on the battle with the "big" international drivers. ERC is the biggest championship that is/was somewhat accessible for national drivers. But now FIA is messing it up by seperating the fields for those who are entered in the championship and those who are not. A national driver with top car can start 30-40 cars after the other "top" drivers... They are destroying the most interesting thing of the championhip...Last edited by tommeke_B; 8th February 2015 at 20:08.
- Likes: AndyRAC (11th February 2015),Mirek (8th February 2015),WUff1 (9th February 2015)
-
8th February 2015, 20:26 #75
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Wroclaw
- Posts
- 8,612
- Like
- 4,481
- Liked 3,305 Times in 1,741 Posts
http://www.rallymadness.prv.pl - rally photos and movies!
-
8th February 2015, 20:51 #76
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 3,786
- Like
- 405
- Liked 827 Times in 374 Posts
Last edited by mousti; 8th February 2015 at 21:14.
Join us on https://www.facebook.com/TACrally
-
8th February 2015, 22:13 #77
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,522
- Like
- 7,835
- Liked 11,171 Times in 4,437 Posts
People shall not look at ERC as a competition to WRC. It will never be a competition to WRC unless FIA or RBMH fucks things up. There is plenty of bad things about ERC now but the fact is that ERC has never had so many regulars. It shows that some things we don't like actually work (such as those separate fields).
When IRC was on its top the regulars were only about a dozen of drivers of very high quality largely sitting in works cars. People were crying that only several drivers do the whole championship and some events looked like a farce (China for example). Now we have plenty of drivers but we have reasonably weaker competition on top. That may by a temporary issue caused by waiting for Škoda. It's not only the works team. I'm sure there are private teams waiting for Fabia R5 which may want to take part in ERC. In any case for me only the existence of JERC makes ERC worth following.
I also very much disagree with saying that IRC had better calendars than ERC. The calendars were messy in that time. There were great events and really bad ones. Calendar was too large, changing a lot every year and often made little sense with ambitious experiments like China, Kenya, Brazil or Russia. The calendar what we have now is reduced to a sensible number of events and is relatively well balanced.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: WRC1 (8th February 2015)
-
8th February 2015, 22:38 #78
-
8th February 2015, 23:45 #79
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Exmuhle.....
- Posts
- 5,300
- Like
- 2,621
- Liked 1,252 Times in 681 Posts
I'd agree with Mirek - the IRC was sometimes very, very good. But, alas it was also sometimes pretty poor. It seemed it wanted to be another International Rally series; which sounds good in theory, but is expensive.
The IRC Montes were the highlight, along with Ypres and Barum; I also enjoyed Valais 2008 with the first live TV coverage. The Sanremo with the monster stage on the Friday night was also something that worked - and probably wouldn't have been allowed in the WRC. I did like the freedom the organisers had, something the WRC still can't get right.
It seems that if a country had a strong S2000 scene, then they usually got a very good IRC entry. And, the opposite is true - the IRC Rally Scotland was a fantastic event; apart from the entry. Very few 'local' UK crews entered. And that is because hardly anybody had a S2000. Off the top of my head, the 2009 event had Wilks, Meeke, Cronin, McRae, Gould, plus '0' car driven by Wilson as the only S2000 cars... The following 2 years were slightly better, but not fantastic.
I think by 2012, they had to call it a day - and merging with the ERC was probably the right move. Though, I'm still not convinced they've got the ERC totally right.
Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???
- Likes: Mirek (9th February 2015)
-
10th February 2015, 10:43 #80
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- New Zealand
- Posts
- 382
- Like
- 470
- Liked 216 Times in 105 Posts
So far ERC has only run 2 very specialised events this year. Neither used regular surfaces and were highly unpredictable as to exactly what tyres and/or setup to run. They are also dominated typically by specialist drivers and require prior knowledge of driving on a rather unusual surface...
Even Breen who is a semi works driver struggled with setup in Janner. If I was wanting to enter a series and had a limited budget and there were events like that, I would avoid them and stick to regular gravel or tarmac events that I have a reliable tyre and setup arrangement for and not risk a gamble. This sport is expensive and if you have to have 3 types of tyres on hand in significant quantities, that could well bankrupt a privateer.
Fantastic entry for Jim Clark Rally and the Reivers Rally too. https://rallies.info/webentry/2024/jimclark/entries.php?type=s https://rallies.info/webentry/2024/jimclarkreivers/entries.php?type=s
British & Irish Championships...