Results 11 to 20 of 66
Thread: The solution to the WRC
-
7th July 2014, 12:45 #11
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 1,002
- Like
- 27
- Liked 178 Times in 78 Posts
For me the WRC has become less marketable or attractive to prospective manufacturers because of the domination of a single team/driver. With Loeb gone, the WRC could be dominated by Ogier/VW (on an even larger scale!) until 2019, or even longer.
For a die hard fan, it becomes a little uninteresting when you know that Ogier will win pretty much every rally. We are half way through the season and would anyone bet against Ogier from taking title number 2? It was the same in 2013. VW obviously have a far superior car, the drivers will propbably finish 1-2-3 in the final standings. Is there a solution to this? The only fair way I can think of budget caps for the teams.
The fact its the sport would be more popular if the results were unpredictable. This will never happen if one team dominate, no matter how much you promote the show, or how many live stages, final day shootouts, or pit stops there are.
-
7th July 2014, 15:00 #12
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 180
- Like
- 5
- Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I agree with rjbetty that bringing back pre-2004 rules could help, although IMO Pluto is right that there are plenty of other factors that caused WRC is no so much attractive. I started interesting in WRC in 1997, and agree that 2001-2003 was really amazing, probably best time for WRC.
I also very much dislike Super Rally. If I remember correctly it was 2005 when Super Rally drivers started being classified in the final results of the rally and I lost much of my interest in WRC because of this. I never liked ideas that turn sport into a show. And SR is probably one of the reason that there is so little private WRC drivers.
The problem is that FIA is looking for solution in some strange way (shoot out) rather than bring back eurosport TV coverage. Lack of good promotion is IMO main problem.Last edited by havk; 7th July 2014 at 15:03.
-
7th July 2014, 15:16 #13
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
I think that everybody on this forum already know that I hate superally so I won't write another wall of text which anyway everybody hates to read
Just one point... Superally removed the goal of finishing the event.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: rjbetty (7th July 2014)
-
7th July 2014, 16:08 #14
-
7th July 2014, 16:09 #15
-
7th July 2014, 17:25 #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 3,585
- Like
- 1,913
- Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
-
7th July 2014, 17:59 #17
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- South East England
- Posts
- 1,490
- Like
- 232
- Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
Totally agree with this. Back around 2005 or so, I used to keep the main results in a spreadsheet not having much access to the web then. I hated superrally so much I didn´t count the drivers who had used it in my results!!
I also agree it stuffs privateer drivers over, as they ought to earn the right to points having kept it going to the end. I didn´t mind in 2004 when superrally was trialled where drivers who had retired could still run, thus pleasing the fans, but they weren´t included in the final results.
I wouldn't mind a compromise where it would return to drivers not being included, but maybe they could still be included for manufacturer (team these days?) points, thus giving drivers an incentive to push.
EDIT: Also, a huge problem for me is that like F1, top WRC cars are ultra-reliable these days compared to 10yrs+ ago. This has heavily contributed to the lack of different winners. I mean between 2006-present I think all rally wins have been divided between just 5 drivers:
Loeb, Gronholm, Hirvonen, Latvala and Ogier - with the exceptions of Mads Ostberg in Portugal 2012 and Dani Sordo in Germany 2013.
Compare that with 2001-2003 alone where rally winners included;
Tommi Makinen
Harri Rovanpera
Didier Auriol
Colin Mcrae
Marcus Gronholm
Richard Burns
Jésus Puras
Gilles Panizzi
Carlos Sainz
Sébastien Loeb
Petter Solberg
and Markko Martin
I'd say ultra-reliability just as in F1 is ruining the variety. What I've also particularly been unhappy about is that smaller works teams and privateers haven't been able to score points due to top drivers benefitting from superrally, thus stopping them creating an impression, and killing their careers.
Matthew Wilson suffered a lot of flak but I'm sure he would have got at least 1 podium somewhere. Others like Antony Warmbold suffered as well, as I know he was pushed out of the points several times by superrallying drivers in better cars, such as Monte-Carlo 2005.Last edited by rjbetty; 7th July 2014 at 18:17.
SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.
-
7th July 2014, 18:35 #18
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Exmuhle.....
- Posts
- 5,297
- Like
- 2,619
- Liked 1,251 Times in 680 Posts
-
7th July 2014, 19:53 #19
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
Carmakers take it as a marketing tool. I don't think they really care if there is some engineering challenge. The people who decides the involvement are economists and marketing specialists not engineers. They simply want to defeat their rivals on the market in something what is as much visible on public as possible.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
7th July 2014, 19:59 #20
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Östhammar, Sweden
- Posts
- 8,117
- Like
- 5,645
- Liked 2,839 Times in 1,612 Posts
"Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...
At 65 years old retirement is a very real option.
F1 Guru Adrian Newey leave Redbull