Results 21 to 30 of 65
Thread: James Bond: Casino Royal
-
11th December 2006, 11:48 #21
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
I agree with Jamie on the crane bit. I did think the first pedestrian chase scene was a touch pointless. Sure nothing happens but there was character development. I guess it's always going to be a problem when they're releasing a prelude which the movie was in a way.Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
11th December 2006, 11:56 #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 38,577
- Like
- 78
- Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
The bad guy in the first chase scene was better in Top Gear
Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums
-
11th December 2006, 11:57 #23
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Am I alone in thinking that Bond shouldn't have swerved?
Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
11th December 2006, 11:59 #24
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 38,577
- Like
- 78
- Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
It was the cannon under the car that did the damage, not his swerving, The car would have easily coped with that without flipping over
Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums
-
11th December 2006, 12:03 #25
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
11th December 2006, 12:43 #26
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Posts
- 11,752
- Like
- 474
- Liked 578 Times in 210 Posts
Yeah he shouldn't have swerved.
What was the ass whipping all about too.... :\If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off!
-
11th December 2006, 12:55 #27
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by J4MIERule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
11th December 2006, 12:57 #28
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Durban, South Africa
- Posts
- 7,996
- Like
- 17
- Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel"But it aint how hard you hit, it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done." Rocky.
-
11th December 2006, 13:01 #29
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Black Rock, Victoria, Australia
- Posts
- 3,866
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel
I have to say, with this new Bond, they seem to have been going for a different market. The chicks and gay guys. Wasn't Bond always supposed to be this cool, swuave person that every man wanted to be? It seems they are putting more emphasis on 'sexy' with Daniel Craig. Damn, if I see him getting out of the water in those bloody togs one more time I think i'll throw up!
And I don't think it was his arse the guy with the rope was aiming for...Mark Webber - Michael's master :cool:
-
11th December 2006, 13:02 #30
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
So true schultz. NO wonder Bond never had any children
Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
Those of "questionable knowledge" will be the scientists. You might think that rocket science is hard but: Rocket Scientist: Someone who understands Newton's Laws of motion and basic chemistry....
What's the first thing to come to...