Results 111 to 120 of 281
Thread: Malaysian Boeing 777 missing
-
10th May 2014, 17:31 #111
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Sleezattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 3,342
- Like
- 737
- Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
-
11th May 2014, 01:58 #112
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- To the right of the left
- Posts
- 3,746
- Like
- 3
- Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
-
11th May 2014, 20:21 #113
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 1,461
- Like
- 109
- Liked 47 Times in 35 Posts
The Carlyle explanation could carry some weight .Some Government somewhere knows more than they are prepared to admit they know.The terrorists would not boast about them successfully diverting this plane if they intend to use it to bomb a large city or country .Still no debri anywhere,and I doubt there will be any found ,so it must have landed !
-
12th May 2014, 02:42 #114
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 19,975
- Like
- 0
- Liked 19 Times in 15 Posts
-
12th May 2014, 15:31 #115
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Cowtown, Canada
- Posts
- 13,789
- Like
- 25
- Liked 82 Times in 63 Posts
But that would mean that the plane would need to be intact, having landed on a paved runway almost two miles long, parked undetected on a tarmac with refueling provisions.
These planes cannot simply be refueled with a few dozen jerry cans. Specialized pumping equipment is required. Just the procurement of a large quantity of jet fuel is difficult, especially without arousal of suspicion.
Sorry, don’t buy that scenario.“If everything's under control, you're going too slow.” Mario Andretti
-
12th May 2014, 23:13 #116
-
13th May 2014, 04:03 #117
Here's what [may have] really happened:
The plane was hijacked.
And shot down by China/US/Malaysia instead of being allowed to be used as a 'weapon'?
A massive coverup follows.
-
13th May 2014, 04:14 #118
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- To the right of the left
- Posts
- 3,746
- Like
- 3
- Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
-
13th May 2014, 19:21 #119
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 1,461
- Like
- 109
- Liked 47 Times in 35 Posts
But again NO debri !
-
13th May 2014, 21:21 #120
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,821
- Like
- 2,088
- Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
Being spread over a larger area would surely give a better chance of something being found?
Only way I can see that there wouldn't be parts found eventually, if it's in the sea, would be if it made a slow landing (like the Hudson river incident) and sank without breaking up or went in nose first.
Turbine blade.
What's the first thing to come to...