Malaysian Boeing 777 missing

[janvanvurpa]

Anyone who thinks that the Pakistani Air Force would not intercept and probably shoot down an unidentified plane flying over from India across probably the most sensitive border area in the world has to be a nutjob themselves. Also lets not forget that the USAF itself also monitors airspace across a broad swathe of Pakistan as part of its operations in Afghanistan and would likely have seen something, nor the Indians monitoring flights across its own territory let alone one flying without permission to Pakistan.

Yes BUT! what if they were all paid off? HA! din't think of dat, didya?

[Starter]

Yes BUT! what if they were all paid off? HA! din't think of dat, didya?

And, in Pakistan, a not insignificant part of the government is sympathetic to radical Islam. But I still think that's the lesser probability.

[driveace]

The Carlyle explanation could carry some weight .Some Government somewhere knows more than they are prepared to admit they know.The terrorists would not boast about them successfully diverting this plane if they intend to use it to bomb a large city or country .Still no debri anywhere,and I doubt there will be any found ,so it must have landed !

[Roamy]

http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/201...sappeared.html

Here is a good conspiracy theory to think about .
And the way things have gone , this one makes more sense than a lot of the official explanations .

Yea I like this one a lot

[schmenke]

...if they intend to use it to bomb a large city or country ...

But that would mean that the plane would need to be intact, having landed on a paved runway almost two miles long, parked undetected on a tarmac with refueling provisions.

These planes cannot simply be refueled with a few dozen jerry cans. Specialized pumping equipment is required. Just the procurement of a large quantity of jet fuel is difficult, especially without arousal of suspicion.

Sorry, don’t buy that scenario.

[donKey jote]

Sorry, don’t buy that scenario.

i doubt many in their sane mind would either

[Koz]

Here's what [may have] really happened:

The plane was hijacked.
And shot down by China/US/Malaysia instead of being allowed to be used as a 'weapon'?
A massive coverup follows.

[Starter]

Here's what [may have] really happened:

The plane was hijacked.
And shot down by China/US/Malaysia instead of being allowed to be used as a 'weapon'?
A massive coverup follows.

Great movie script.

[driveace]

But again NO debri !

[RS]

No, I don’t think it’s odd that there hasn't been even the tiniest of pieces of the plane or its contents found. It’s not inconceivable to assume the plane either exploded at high altitude or crashed violently into the sea. In both scenarios debris would have both sunk and been scattered over a wide area of the Indian Ocean. Wind and currents would have scattered the small, hard to detect pieces, over an even larger area.

Being spread over a larger area would surely give a better chance of something being found?

Only way I can see that there wouldn't be parts found eventually, if it's in the sea, would be if it made a slow landing (like the Hudson river incident) and sank without breaking up or went in nose first.