Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 117
  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    3,553
    Like
    1
    Liked 78 Times in 73 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Capps
    Looks like a Typ 1936 or Typ 1937 to me... especially given that the folks at A-U never used the alphabet system as designations for the cars, but rather, Typ 1934, Typ 1935, Typ 1936 & Typ 1937, Typ 1938 & Typ 1939.
    I don't want to drag the thread off topic, but I would like to know the answer.
    I believe the Auto Union Type A, B, C, D designations were invented by Laurence Pomeroy (Junior) and adopted by everyone as they are convenient designations.
    But what were the official Auto Union designations? I know the 1937 Auto-Union "Type C" was officially a Horch Type 22 from a contemporary Motor Sport report. Don, do you happen to know the official designations of any of the the others Auto Unions? For example did their record breakers andhillclimb cars have different Horch type numbers from the GP cars they were based on?
    Duncan Rollo

    The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

  2. #52
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ShiftingGears
    I actually really like the Gold Leaf livery, especially on the 49. It doesn't look so good on the 72 though.
    The Gold Leaf livery on the 56B looks downright weird. Actually so does the gold and black livery which also appeared on the 56B.
    Come to think of it, the only livery which properly worked on the 56 was the all-red STP, as even the various coloured tips to distinguish the cars look strange.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  3. #53
    Senior Member 555-04Q2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    7,996
    Like
    17
    Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabolica
    As promised, the R18.

    Pornography on wheels
    "But it aint how hard you hit, it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done." Rocky.

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    541
    Like
    0
    Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Type
    I don't want to drag the thread off topic, but I would like to know the answer.
    I believe the Auto Union Type A, B, C, D designations were invented by Laurence Pomeroy (Junior) and adopted by everyone as they are convenient designations.
    But what were the official Auto Union designations? I know the 1937 Auto-Union "Type C" was officially a Horch Type 22 from a contemporary Motor Sport report. Don, do you happen to know the official designations of any of the the others Auto Unions? For example did their record breakers andhillclimb cars have different Horch type numbers from the GP cars they were based on?
    Several years ago, when I first saw the Horch Typ 22 designation for the Typ 1937 A-U racing machine applied to the machine being exhibited in Britain per Motor Sport, my research finally led me to the thought that it was a means to deal with the customs issues.

    I looked at several listings of Horch types and none seemed to suggest that they could have been used for the A-U machines; then again, I do not remember seeing the Typ 22 among the Horch models.

    I have found nothing else to support the notion that the A-U racing machines also had Horch type designations.

    Not to say that this is not possible, simply that I could not find anything, leavng me a bit puzzled as to exactly how MS came up with that information -- which is why I ended up thinking that it had something to do with the customs paperwork.
    Popular memory is not history.... -- Gordon Wood

  5. #55
    Senior Member anfield5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New Plymouth; New Zealand
    Posts
    4,328
    Like
    8
    Liked 165 Times in 131 Posts


    The beautiful Brabham Bt52, one of the most elegant F1 cars ever built

  6. #56
    Senior Member Tazio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    15,391
    Like
    1,117
    Liked 646 Times in 511 Posts
    I'm partial to the 1967 330 P4

    May the forza be with you

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    572
    Like
    1
    Liked 51 Times in 44 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Alca-Tazizzle
    I'm partial to the 1967 330 P4
    So am I. I believe Italian panel beaters of this era were incapable of crafting an ordinary looking auto. Unrestricted with aerodynamic requirements, they simply stuck to the principle if it looks right, it will be. Wings, flaps, bills and whatever came just a few years down the road; witness the 512M cars for examples of not so clean design.

    Adding to the appeal of these cars is the general absence of commercial stickers. This is one of my favourites, the last Le Mans winning Ferrari, the 250 LM. Period photos confirm the discreet NART decal was about all that was evident on the body. The car looks in much better shape then when Masten Gregory and Jochen Rindt trashed it unmercifully and ended up winning the 1965 race to their own surprise.

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    365
    Like
    0
    Liked 25 Times in 25 Posts
    Gordon Murray was capable of producing lookers. His mid-70's Brabhams were some of my favourites.

    Conversely, the car that was unjustly beaten (my opinion, not fact) by the BT52, the Renault RE40, was the frumpiest looking thing ever to come out of France. Marilon Cotillard it was not.
    Q: What's worse than a Bully? A: His Sidekick

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    365
    Like
    0
    Liked 25 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabolica
    Gordon Murray was capable of producing lookers. His mid-70's Brabhams were some of my favourites.

    Conversely, the car that was unjustly beaten (my opinion, not fact) by the BT52, the Renault RE40, was the frumpiest looking thing ever to come out of France. Marilon Cotillard it was not.


    The 1977 Brabham BT45. Featuring the most elegant air intake solution ever seen.
    Q: What's worse than a Bully? A: His Sidekick

  10. Likes: Fortitude (16th January 2022)
  11. #60
    Senior Member anfield5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New Plymouth; New Zealand
    Posts
    4,328
    Like
    8
    Liked 165 Times in 131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Parabolica


    The 1977 Brabham BT45. Featuring the most elegant air intake solution ever seen.
    This was going to get my vote in the ugly thread

  12. Likes: Fortitude (16th January 2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •