Results 21 to 30 of 39
-
9th July 2013, 02:15 #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 196
- Like
- 82
- Liked 48 Times in 32 Posts
Fantastic idea Vhat. The only problem I see with that is the marshalls won't get a decent gap between cars to allow them to clear something from the track. It is workable though.
-
9th July 2013, 09:18 #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 15,233
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warriwa
Should a lapped driver with no realistic chance of points be artificially released and be able to move up the leader table because of a SC? Should a driver in the lead by 30 seconds and who may have been really pushing his tyres overtaking backmarkers to try and build up a sufficient lead then be penalised by seeing all the lapped drivers pass him and the 2nd place and be artificially installed on his gearbox? At least if there were lapped drivers behind him, it will give him a second or so buffer to try and get a break that he would have formally had.
Safety cars are necessary and by bunching the drivers up, slower cars are going to benefit and faster lose out but lets try to maintain the integrity of the race as much as possible to not further penalise the leaders.
-
9th July 2013, 12:18 #23
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 378
- Like
- 0
- Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Warriwa
What I would do is have a relatively small oval track where they basically drive in circles. Pit lane limter speed, as I suggested before, still turned on. When the track is cleared, the leader is allowed to leave the oval, but all cars wanting to leave the oval must have completed the same amount of laps the leader has.
Size is actually irrelevant, but "small" for cost concerns. Doesn't even need to be an oval, could be nearly a "two lane" track with hairpin corners on either end. But F1 has a habit of only worrying about sharp sticks after someone's eye is already poked out.
-
9th July 2013, 13:48 #24
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Woodridge, Illinois, USA
- Posts
- 4,485
- Like
- 639
- Liked 1,082 Times in 604 Posts
Is this a bad rule because a fast car (Webber's) was 1) a lap down 2) was able to unlap itself, and 3) eventually score points? Or is it bad for some other reason?
" Lady - I'm in an awful dilemma.
Moe - Yeah, I never cared much for these foreign cars either."
-
9th July 2013, 13:59 #25
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 1,583
- Like
- 68
- Liked 182 Times in 139 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger
-
9th July 2013, 14:10 #26
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 1,583
- Like
- 68
- Liked 182 Times in 139 Posts
The way I see it, no matter what rules are set to deal with safety cars, you still end in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation.
If the lapped cars are allowed to unlap themselves before the green flag, then you will have people complain about why this happened, as in this thread.
On the other hand, if lapped cars are not allowed to unlap themselves, then it will not be fair to them. Suppose some car's position is number 20 and the 19 car is 10 seconds in front of it. Let's suppose the safety car is now between them. The 19 car can go around the lap to get behind the procession. After the green flag, the 20 car is now something like +1 minute behind the 19 car, even though it was only 10 seconds behind before the safety car came on track.
I personally like the idea of letting the lapped traffic to unlap because it will make the restart more exciting. These days there aren't as many lapped cars as say in the early 90s, when the leader could normally lap almost the entire field and sometimes his teammate, so waiting for everyone to be unlapped shouldn't take long now (on average at least).
-
9th July 2013, 16:09 #27
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,607
- Like
- 28
- Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by zako85
Given that it's suffered by someone who's already been lapped and in all probability won't be scoring points, I'm not sure it justifies keeping the safety car out for an extra 3 laps for unlapping though.
As you say there is no perfect rule.
-
9th July 2013, 17:38 #28
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,078
- Like
- 0
- Liked 17 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by zako85
-
10th July 2013, 02:16 #29
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by zako85
I too think the unlapping scenario is the best
My issue is with the time it takes to get it done
1. As soon as the SC picks up the leaders, then the lapped cars should have the go ahead to unlap themselves, so this can be done at the same time the marshals are doing what they need to do.
Of course, safely too.
2. There needs to be more than 1 safety car, perhaps 3, with one in each sector, ready to pick up the leader wherever he is, then the rest of the pack can then fall in tow. This will eliminate the extra half lap it takes , while the top cars "artificially" gain a pitstop and holding up proceedings even more. Thus penalizing anyone who actually had the temerity to pit during actual race conditions. This has long been a thorn on my side. One could be in p2 make a pitstop, ,fall back to p10, then the SC comes and at least the top 3-5 cars get a free stop, don't lose position and you end up farther down than you should be.
3. the whole process needs to be handled more efficient and quicker by teams, drivers and race control
for example, they give the call for cars to unlap themselves, and then for some reason it takes another half lap before the blokes realize that and then go around. Either teams are not getting the info quick enough and passing it along to their drivers, or the drivers themselves take their sweet time to proceed.you can't argue with results.
-
10th July 2013, 07:42 #30
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 10,568
- Like
- 695
- Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
Originally Posted by truefan72
I still maintain the cars a lap or more down could just drop to the tail of the field.
But in relation to your points.
1. I am not sure thats wise. Sometimes incidents that bring out the SC vary and thus it would be unwise to allow cars to move around the circuit straight away.
2. This could be a winner. I mean Le Mans do it albeit with a longer circuit but it would certainly stop the wasted laps. If cars lapped in each train moved through and just joined the next SC train, that would leave a 20-25 second gap ahead of each train at the restart.
3. Would agree with that. The whole exercise once its clear the type of incident being handled is under control is very slow and needs to be streamlined.
Good Points TruefanI still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy
M-Sport Ford Puma has received a significant improvement this season. Ford has been able to test its car in a simulator in North Carolina, USA. This has brought a significant improvement in the...
M-Sport Ford World Rally Teams