Quote Originally Posted by Malbec
I have to admit my enjoyment of the race was reduced by the fact that the racing was protective of the tyres but there hasn't been a single season where there hasn't been a need to protect some aspect of the car. For me the huge negative aspect which you haven't mentioned were the multiple tyre failures over the past two race weekends due to debris while the big positive was Hembrey's willingness to accept they had made an error for Barcelona which they would rectify over the remaining season. At least Pirelli takes an active interest in addressing shortfalls, whatever you say of Bridgestone they were never concerned with doing anything to change their tyre plan once they became sole supplier except for ensuring two tyre compounds had to be used per race in order to use up tyre stocks.
There wasn't any debris that caused the tire failures. The tires decomposed because they aren't fit for the purpose. Fictional debris might work in NASCRAP, not in F1. No car left debris on the track when diResta's tire destroyed itself in practice. Neither was there any 'debris' when hamilton's tire disassembled itself at Bahrain. There also weren't any collisions to explain the tire deconstruction in the race or Alonso's deflating tire. Pirelli simply ****ed up.

And your claim that RB should redesign their car - didn't you mix up something? Pirelli is a SUPPLIER. It's their ****ing job to provide a component that works for their customers, not the other way round. I worked for Bosch in 2009. They were a supplier to Audi, developing the servo-steering systems. It was Bosch's job to manufacture a servo-steering that works in an Audi, not Audi's job to redesign their A6 to work with a crap servo. What kind of attitude is that??