Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    1,490
    Like
    232
    Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13
    Thanks

    It was very sad really , but I love looking stats and things in F1. mokin:
    No, I prefer to call it passion.
    SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.

  2. #12
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    It was interesting to note that on the whole. The gap to 10th was 1.5-2.5 seconds nearly all the way through.

    The bottom cars were more often than not 4-6 seconds off. Although in the cases of Ide, Yoong and Marques the gap was to do more with the drivers rather than the car.

    2009 was the exceptional year with the grid so close.

    I think 2013 would be about 4.5-5 seconds spread quite evenly. So you may be right it appears Toro Rosso & Williams have slipped slightly to 2.5-3 seconds behind.


    Of course it could be even more next season.
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    1,490
    Like
    232
    Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
    Yeah, it looks like the grid has spread out a bit since last year, and sadly it appears that your prediction of Red Bull running away with it this year is coming true...

    As for Marussia; has anyone noticed that they're pretty close to the cars in front of them? I wonder if this is actually the closest they got to P2. I will list the gaps of the 4 cars in front relative to Bianchi: Q1 TIMES ONLY

    15.Valtteri Bottas (Williams) -0.819
    16.Adrian Sutil (Force India) -0.817
    17.Pastor Maldonado (Williams) -0.533
    18.Esteban Gutierrez (Sauber) -0.371
    19.Jules Bianchi (Marussia) 1:48.147

    That looks pretty impressive I think. Timo Glock may even have been able to get a place or 2 higher, but given Bianchi's gap to Chilton, it looks like Jules did a good lap. It may be encouraging to note that Marussia have usually improved after the first race, though last year they wee simply so unprepared so they were bound to improve. Also, their funds for development are pretty low.
    SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.

  4. #14
    Guest
    úp cho ngÃ*y cu?i tu?n nÃ*o

  5. #15
    Guest
    úp cho ngÃ*y cu?i tu?n nÃ*o

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    1,490
    Like
    232
    Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
    Enjoy your stay - you won't be here long!
    SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.

  7. #17
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    Yer early days, but I think the Marussia looks good.

    Bianchi and Chilton both look at home and as you point out the gap to the next 3 or 4 cars is less than a second.
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  8. #18
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    I wonder if Sauber regret getting rid of Kobayashi for guiterrez.
    I just watched the race again and the guy looked really raw.
    Like he needed an entire season of Friday practices.
    you can't argue with results.

  9. #19
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13
    Yer early days, but I think the Marussia looks good.

    Bianchi and Chilton both look at home and as you point out the gap to the next 3 or 4 cars is less than a second.
    I will admit that Bianchi is looking way better than I thought he would.
    And Van de Garde even worse than I thought.
    you can't argue with results.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •