Results 1,191 to 1,200 of 2266
Thread: Citroen WRT
-
27th February 2018, 16:01 #1191
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
- Posts
- 501
- Like
- 124
- Liked 388 Times in 194 Posts
Was it not reported that after Mikelsen had driven the car changes were made, ones that Kris had been asking for for a while.
Either way, let's just hope the changes can bring a significant improvement in results so that Citroen decides to continue next year, and let alone give Meeke another year but hopefully Breen a full season.
-
27th February 2018, 16:04 #1192
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 3,242
- Like
- 2,598
- Liked 2,278 Times in 1,071 Posts
Not totally true. There are facts out in the open and it's not difficult to see why things went wrong, unless you're an ostrich.
It's been admitted by Matton on many occasions that the risks the team took in engineering and development backfired. He held his hands up. You then had quotes from the new tech chief Besse, saying that individuals within the team found it difficult to admit to their mistakes (some have now left or been sacked), until the penny finally dropped after Mikkelsen and then Loeb said the exact same things about the car as the regular drivers. Changes were only then implemented which the regular drivers had been pushing for for months prior.
After the midpoint of last season, certain Citroen staff "moved on", and the man who designed and penned the car was replaced. Meeke's position was also strengthened (despite a spate of crashes), and with the team all on the same page and working together properly, Citroen have moved forward and the development has been good. Besse has been a great appointment as technical director and the improvements are there to seen. Loeb's recent interview further emphasises that (the article on the WRC website. Not the interview just uploaded on the WRC YouTube channel, where Loeb talks about the difficulties of the car before the changes in the second half of last season).
Looking at all that, it seems Citroen ballsed up not taking the testing feedback on-board earlier, which either suggests arrogance and stubbornness (Besse's quotes suggest that could've been the case), or a lack of trust in Meeke, Breen and Lefebrve's feedback on the car. Or maybe a bit of both? However if they didn't trust the feedback from those drivers from the start, they should've let other drivers help test and develop the car in 2016. Yet we know that wasn't the case, as despite Meeke saying he wanted Loeb or another experienced driver to test the car, nobody did (until Loeb in 2017). Why not? Ask Matton.
You look at VW testing this Polo R5, they have Depping, Tiedemand, Gronholm and now Solberg all in the car. Vastly different drivers all with different experience, but you can bet all their individual feedback is being analysed and taken on-board properly, with changes and tweaks made accordingly. Citroen could've tapped into drivers like Loeb and Carlos Sainz's knowledge and experience in 2016, and it was a huge oversight not doing so. Instead of being proactive, the team were reactive to bad results which meant Loeb only tested the car in August/September of 2017 (when it should have been August 2016). If Loeb tested the car before 2017, he would've said the same things about it as he did almost a year later, and the same things as Meeke, Breen, Lefebrve and Mikkelsen all said before him.
So that's where you're wrong about Meeke and the other drivers being clueless, they all new the areas which needed improved. That's just a fact.
But the main thing is, since Besse's appointment and the realisation from within the team that things needed changed on the car, we now have a more competitive and drivable car on most terrains. Further improvements are in the offing too in Argentina, which will hopefully help increase performance further. Better late than never, and at least Citroen eventually realised their mistakes and took action with changes within the team.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
- Likes: AnttiL (27th February 2018),dimviii (27th February 2018),Eli (27th February 2018),Micke_VOC (27th February 2018),Norm75 (27th February 2018),sindroms (28th February 2018),skarderud (28th February 2018),Vulture (28th February 2018)
-
27th February 2018, 17:50 #1193
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,385
- Like
- 2,008
- Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
The hard part for any manufacurer in racing is to make a vehicle that is good out of the box, easy to change to different drivingstyles, and easy to finetune to the individual liking.
For a racecar it is easier than for a rallycar, since it will face more surfaces and weather conditions. Some like them basically to be driven like a backwheel driven, and some like a frontwheel driven car, and som like them quite neutral.
To manage to get a tick in all the boxes (and then some) is not an easy piece of engineering!!
But as said elsewhere, to have the car tested by drivers with many drivingstyles, should be a given. Else you can end up with a car that qould be extremely quick in the hands of a specific style, amd the rest have to adapt to the car, and not vice versa.
Both Subaru and Citroen have made this mistake. Skoda/VW teat a lot with many, and usually wins. MSport uses the commercial Microsoft method; push an ok basecar out quickly to as many customers as possible, adjust it after many reports on the same issue, or if you are not competitive at all!
- Likes: er88 (28th February 2018)
-
27th February 2018, 19:27 #1194
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,004
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
During the 9 months they took to test the car, all drivers showed delighted and hopeful on the car success. We only start to hear complains after the first outings (MC and Sweden); that’s why I believe the all team, including the drivers, were genuinely surprised by the car issues.
There’s no doubt the tech staff has failed to deliver a proper car, but no one can say for sure it was due to a lack of trust between engineers and drivers, like Brit journos were eager to suggest in order to protect Meeke.
Despite all the fuss, the team is now managing to fix the car and give their drivers a fine chance to shine. Fingers crossed.Last edited by Rally Power; 27th February 2018 at 19:40.
Rally addict since 1982
-
27th February 2018, 21:15 #1195
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 746
- Like
- 171
- Liked 713 Times in 337 Posts
I'm not sure I buy that, the drivers were hardly likely to come out and say the car was a pile of shit in public before it had ever turned a wheel in anger.
I know we are all making some assumptions along the way but it can't be coincidental that after Mikkelsen and then Loeb both said it was crap in low traction conditions things happened. And it wasn't the drivers getting replaced.....
- Likes: er88 (28th February 2018),Mintexmemory (28th February 2018)
-
28th February 2018, 11:05 #1196
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 18,932
- Like
- 3,434
- Liked 9,372 Times in 4,985 Posts
Loeb sorry for Breen...
https://www.motorsport-news.co.uk/ne...roen-wrc-seat/
-
28th February 2018, 17:59 #1197
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 18,932
- Like
- 3,434
- Liked 9,372 Times in 4,985 Posts
Breen speaking on Absolute Rally said he had a horrible SD in Sweden and a bad feeling with the car. But on SS1 he went into a corner seemingly too quick and just 'chucked it in and hoped for the best'... and amazingly the car stuck and he thought ok I'll keep this speed and the C3 kept sticking !
Seems like it was a pure fluke they hit on a good set-up.
- Likes: A FONDO (28th February 2018),Micke_VOC (7th March 2018),Rallyper (28th February 2018),the sniper (28th February 2018)
-
28th February 2018, 18:57 #1198
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,004
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
Rally addict since 1982
-
28th February 2018, 23:46 #1199
-
1st March 2018, 11:19 #1200
For me it sound reasonable to remove Hybrid from the car in terms of cost saving. If I am not mistaken, one unit is ca 15% of the total car cost. And in most of the rallies, more than one unit is...
WRC main class in 2025