Results 21 to 30 of 128
Thread: Your ideas to fix Indycar
-
10th January 2013, 18:43 #21
Enough with the "chimp" references.
I'll say no more.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
10th January 2013, 18:45 #22
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C3PO
Champcar simply died, because nobody watched it'
IRL simply died, because nobody watched it.
IndyCar simply died, because nobody watched it.
Amazing how many open wheel series you can plug into that sentence and have it be true.
-
10th January 2013, 20:01 #23
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- So Cal, Palos Verdes
- Posts
- 881
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
-
10th January 2013, 20:46 #24Originally Posted by C3PO
Look amigo, the OP wanted suggestions on what could be done to fix the series as it stands now. CART went bankrupt. CCWS was a sad shadow of what CART was, so was the IRL and so is Indy Car. I shouldn't have to waste my time presenting data which supports that factual conclusion. And I'm not going to waste my time rehashing ancient history with you. In case you haven't noticed, there are only a handful of people left on this (and every other Indy style) board who even care anymore. We're making every attempt to keep caring, but it ain't easy - and comments like you're making really don't help. Believe me.
The TV ratings now barely rival a bad, late night infomercial - they are no better than Champ Car's. This series has NEVER turned a profit. 17 consecutive quarters of losses is probably a record in the world of business... so I'm sure that 17 years has got to be worthy of a Guinness Book record of some sort. It is (by definition) a failed business model. The public has tuned out and turned off. So what purpose is there in discussing the gallons of milk that have been spilled over the past 17 years or so? Do you truly believe that will fix anything??? Really?!
The only idea that I have now (after 10+ years of repeating what I thought were decent, rational ideas) is to find a new, wealthy benefactor, maybe from the high tech sector. Someone who thinks cars and racing are cool. Someone who has the money and the desire to spend about $100 million over the next 5-7 years to rebuild this trainwreck. Probably need to set up a side fund to pay some world class drivers from F1 and NASCAR, since nobody gives a rat's hairy brown butt about the drivers who are in the series now - well except for the people who think that Danica is still an IRL/IndyCar driver."Every generation's memory is exactly as long as its own experience." --John Kenneth Galbraith
-
10th January 2013, 23:36 #25
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- On Chesapeake Bay.
- Posts
- 4,299
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by C3POHINCHTOWN!!
-
11th January 2013, 11:10 #26
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 23
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nigelred5
-
11th January 2013, 13:47 #27
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- To the right of the left
- Posts
- 3,746
- Like
- 3
- Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
Originally Posted by C3PO
So in conclusion, I'd say your premise is deeply flawed."Old roats am jake mit goats."
-- Smokey Stover
-
11th January 2013, 17:48 #28
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- outback
- Posts
- 538
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I loved CART. It was noisy (something the TV guys could do is not mute the engine sounds) fast , sexy and exciting. Now, it is boring even for me that goes to the race sites first thing each day.
Ever go to a race and once the anthem has finished along come the F-18's or 16's.
Well, one day I was at my one and only NASCAR race at Michigan and they had a B-17 following the F-18's. It was slow and cumbersome. I loved seeing it as it means so much to the country. But, to use it's makeup, mechanically and aesthetics it was not a pretty plane. Slow but could get the job done.
Now look at the F-18's, Noisy, fast , totally sexy and spectacular. I also love the B-17. My point is that the sexy beast aspect has to be promoted.
Has anyone ever seen the ad in Europe, I believe Tissot runs it where there is a camera behind a crowd of people in the stands. It's a practice session
with one car on track. You hear it but don't see it. The sound gets louder and the people stretch their necks to see the car. It has rained also.
The all of a sudden this screeching spray passes and then it's gone. The crowd erupts with euphoria. Thing is, the car was not seen. It was just noise and the spray and the unbridled speed of an F1 car.
-
11th January 2013, 18:11 #29
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 138
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the ideas to fix Indycar. I appreciate we can learn from the past but we are looking forward! I watched a TV commerical last evening for the Honda SI. They included video of Indycar in it. Sponsors-how about including Indycar in your ads? How about the Drivers seen in print and television commericals? (Helio dancing; formerly Danica). How about Penske using his fleet of rental trucks to have Indycar images plastered on them? Where is Verizon using Indycar in their ads? The list goes on.... Yes, some of these ideas may seem ridiculious, but we need to be thinking outside the box.
-
12th January 2013, 04:16 #30
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Quakertown, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 3,406
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoCalPVguyracing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd
Those of "questionable knowledge" will be the scientists. You might think that rocket science is hard but: Rocket Scientist: Someone who understands Newton's Laws of motion and basic chemistry....
What's the first thing to come to...