Results 21 to 30 of 211
-
29th February 2012, 08:32 #21
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Tallinn, Estonia
- Posts
- 5,637
- Like
- 0
- Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by N4D13
-
29th February 2012, 08:57 #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkOpinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
29th February 2012, 09:01 #23
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by studioseOpinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
29th February 2012, 12:57 #24
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 19,191
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by N4D13I could really use a fish right now
-
29th February 2012, 13:11 #25
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NHSPhysician
Indiana Constitution - Article 1
Originally Posted by Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 32
Beyond that, don't we hear all the time (mostly from the Europeans) that we MUST respect people's cultures and customs, and that we shouldn't poke our nose's in other people's business? Shouldn't that go both ways? In the US it is part of our culture to own guns for whatever reason we want be it self protection, protection of our Country/State, hunting, sport, colection, whatever. Why is that any of your business?The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
29th February 2012, 13:13 #26
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EkiThe overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
29th February 2012, 15:55 #27
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Sleezattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 3,342
- Like
- 737
- Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkJohn Vanlandingham
Sleezattle WA, USA
Vive le Prole-le-ralliat
-
29th February 2012, 17:53 #28
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 19,191
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chuck34I could really use a fish right now
-
29th February 2012, 18:20 #29
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 3,189
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eki
Look them up before making such statement, and such silliness can be avoided. (You look them up. If you want me to, send me fifty bucks for the first hour.)
Bigger gun, hmm, I suppose he just goes down to the local car trunk salesmen and buys a larger handgun that he cannot conceal as well.
Perhaps he is well educated on firearms, as he is a graduate from the local Crim. University, where proper tool use by criminals is taught, along with machinest skills to fix them.
Of course there are the talking heads on, U.S. news that talk about the "powerful" 9mm, but if you showed them two cartridges they probably could not tell .45 from a 9mm.
Better gun.
Maybe like that silly Jolie movie, it can make the bullet curve around corners.
I do like your statement about shoot you first, that is probably why more states are eliminating the asinine law that forced home owner to flee before trying to defend themselves.
If the governor signs it it, now in Minn. when some one breaks your window to break-in, you can shoot the pos dead on the spot. No more grand jury to prove you had a reason to shoot him.
A statement like yours, makes getting such so called castle defense laws passed easier.
Sadly, police training in this country has become a sad state of affairs.
I have spoke to retired policemen who say they come out of the acadamy with storm trooper attitudes and they are taught to spray and pray rather take aimed shots.
One good thing about the castle defense laws, if cops break into the wrong home and the home owner shoots policemen dead, the blame will nowlie with the police, where before home owners were prosecuted for shooting police that broke into their homes, even if it were the werong home.
It has always bothered me that civilians that shoot a non-criminal by accident, including they thought the person was an intruder, could face some degree of manslaughter charge in some states, but police shooting the wrong person, do not face that charge.
Of course that may explain why the second amendment exists to protect us against those who work for the government.
-
29th February 2012, 18:22 #30
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 3,189
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eki
Actually, prohibition in the U.S. showed they might have a few abnormal failings that come with power.
First leg he will be thinking in Portuguese championship. Then he can go for WRC2.
WRC2 news & rumors 2024