Page 10 of 20 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 193
  1. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,581
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    If the Ferrari is as fast as it is ugly, do you think it will create a new world record for the ugliest car ever to win the championship?

  2. #92
    Senior Member Hawkmoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    2,777
    Like
    0
    Liked 65 Times in 42 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Black Knight
    The ugliest Ferrari ever?

    I can't ever remember a Ferrari that looked as ugly as that. It looks like an advanced piece of Lego.
    The 1979 312T4 was described by Enzo Ferrari s the ugliest car he'd ever built. It won both championships.

    Quote Originally Posted by RS
    That one where they changed from a low nose to the raised nose half way through the year was pretty bad (with the raised nose)
    Do you mean the 1996 F310? Schumi managed to drag 3 wins out of it but was neither fast nor pretty.
    Forza Ferrari!!

  3. #93
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    9,532
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkmoon
    The 1979 312T4 was described by Enzo Ferrari s the ugliest car he'd ever built. It won both championships.
    I hope that the new car does the same.
    Formula 1

  4. #94
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N4D13
    By the way, what do you think about the Ferrari's front push-rod suspension? It's rather strange, isn't it?
    Very strange - given that is pull-rod not push-rod. Last team to do that at the front....?

    Minardi!
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  5. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,824
    Like
    2,093
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkmoon
    Do you mean the 1996 F310? Schumi managed to drag 3 wins out of it but was neither fast nor pretty.
    Yes, this one:


  6. #96
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RS
    Yes, this one:

    Gee, thanks - I just brought up a little bit of sick........
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  7. #97
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave B
    If you've got a spare 13 and a half minutes there's a good technical piece on the BBC website with Gary Anderson explaining some details of the new McLaren.

    It's also to note that sometimes a notepad and a pen can be more useful than a 103" HD Skypad!

    BBC Sport - Gary Anderson deconstructs the new McLaren MP4-27

    If you don't have 13mins to spare: Launch Analysis: McLaren Mercedes MP4-27 | Scarbsf1's Blog


    Quote Originally Posted by SGWilko
    Very strange - given that is pull-rod not push-rod. Last team to do that at the front....?

    Minardi!
    Even with high front end chassis concept apparently there's minimal CoG benefit with pull rod design.

    The only rumour proven correct: Ferrari are blowing their rear brake ducts!

    Here you can see the exhaust are pointing to the rear brake ducting and the intricate duct cum diffuser







    Also blowing the rear brake ducts is an avenue worth exploring. The exhaust geometry doesn’t work quite so well in this area. Brake duct vanes, which we have seen proliferate over the past few years are allowed to be 120mm inboard of the rear wheel, roughly in line with the wheel and can protrude forwards the front perimeter of the tyre. But as some of the brake duct is ahead of the rear axle line there is less surface to blow on.
    This might still be better than rear wing blowing, as the downforce is produced directly on the unsprung wheel, rather than passing through the suspension. The benefits of this over rear wing blowing would need a simulation to establish the better path.
    Practicalities of heat shielding the rear brake ducts are already understood from EBDs which already apply of the exhaust plume over their surfaces. Also tricky would the positioning of the brake cooling snorkel, but again this is not insurmountable.

    http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2011/1...blown-effects/

  8. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Well, at least with only half the races on the box this year I only have to look at these ugly munters for ten races. :-/

    I know it shouldn't matter what a car looks like, but it so does.
    All other opinions are wrong....

  9. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,858
    Like
    62
    Liked 478 Times in 371 Posts
    A F1 car is very much like a woman, unless she looks pretty you're unlikely to want to take her for a ride.

  10. #100
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Sometimes, any port in a storm!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •