Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 82
  1. #21
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic
    Gotta get back to the moon first, which I would expect to be a multi-national endeavour. Or, failing that, private companies.
    Mercury, Gemini and Apollo was itemised and reported to Congress at a cost of about $25.4bn in 1973. If you allow 4% inflation, then that would work out to about $112.7bn in 2012 terms. Private companies would want a return from their $112.7bn and to be honest I just don't see how you could turn a profit from such a project.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Mercury, Gemini and Apollo was itemised and reported to Congress at a cost of about $25.4bn in 1973. If you allow 4% inflation, then that would work out to about $112.7bn in 2012 terms. Private companies would want a return from their $112.7bn and to be honest I just don't see how you could turn a profit from such a project.
    They could strike a deal with the BBC and SKY for viewing rights. 10 of the landings would be shown live on the BBC, but all 20 landings can be seen on pay-per-view on SKY.
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    1,014
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    China, if we're talking national efforts. Without question.

    Or a private investor with a lot of money to burn.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    1,798
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Thankyou for all of the replies, @ Zico and Rollo thankyou for the links, they made very interesting reading!

    Quote Originally Posted by Zico
    Cant see it happening but if If it did, probably the Russians, judging from their 500 day Mars simulation in 09 they seem more serious than the US. Obama did say 2030 for a manned orbit and mid 2030's for a landing at a NASA conference in April 2010 NASA - President Barack Obama on Space Exploration in the 21st Century

    ...but he wont be in power then.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    China.

    People's Daily Online -- Roundup: China to develop deep space exploration in five years
    A senior Chinese space agency official said in Beining on Wednesday that China would actively plan its deep space exploration over the next five years, focusing on lunar and Mars exploration.

    Sun Laiyan, administrator of the China National Space Administration, said China would study the distribution and utilization of lunar resources and terrestrial planetary science as well as exploring scientific measures for supporting mankind's sustainable survival on Earth.

    China was the third independent nation to put people into space and to the best of my knowledge, the only nation with any current plans to go to Mars.
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrewmcm
    China, if we're talking national efforts. Without question.

    Or a private investor with a lot of money to burn.
    Most peoples opinions seem to be pointing towards a multi-national effort(perhaps Europe?) or China. Either way, it will be one hell of an achievement if and when its done, and with modern cameras will provide much better coverage than the late 60's/early 70's cameras
    Ha'wey Hamilton, bring the WDC crown home and the beers are on me :up:

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Mercury, Gemini and Apollo was itemised and reported to Congress at a cost of about $25.4bn in 1973. If you allow 4% inflation, then that would work out to about $112.7bn in 2012 terms. Private companies would want a return from their $112.7bn and to be honest I just don't see how you could turn a profit from such a project.
    I've got no reason to doubt your figures and I think it is fair to say that a private space mission would need to accept that there would be no immediate return on investment.
    All other opinions are wrong....

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    117
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Azerbaijan.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,845
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Mercury, Gemini and Apollo was itemised and reported to Congress at a cost of about $25.4bn in 1973. If you allow 4% inflation, then that would work out to about $112.7bn in 2012 terms. Private companies would want a return from their $112.7bn and to be honest I just don't see how you could turn a profit from such a project.
    The stated goal of Space-X (and more specifically Elon Musk) is to go to Mars. They have already orbited a Dragon capsule, and they will be sending one to the ISS in the next few months. After that they have plans to orbit a Bigalow (sp?) inflatable station. Then on to either Mars or the Moon. Granted lots of companies have had these goals in the past, but none of them have ever gotten as far down the path as Space-X. So at this point I don't really have any doubt that Space-X will get to Mars at some point.

    Another point I would take a bit of exception with in your post is the costs. Even if we take the numbers for Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo at face value (which I have no reason not to), that does not mean that a program done now will cost the same. Quite the opposite in fact. The early NASA programs were literally inventing new technologies. All of which are public domain. No one has to re-invent the wheel. A fact that Space-X and other companies have taken advantage of quite well. Space-X has done basically what Gemini did for around $2 Billion (I think that's the number I've heard). So getting to the moon will not cost any where near $112 Billion.
    The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Cowtown, Canada
    Posts
    13,789
    Like
    25
    Liked 82 Times in 63 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck34
    ...Another point I would take a bit of exception with in your post is the costs. Even if we take the numbers for Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo at face value (which I have no reason not to), that does not mean that a program done now will cost the same. Quite the opposite in fact. The early NASA programs were literally inventing new technologies. All of which are public domain. No one has to re-invent the wheel. A fact that Space-X and other companies have taken advantage of quite well. Space-X has done basically what Gemini did for around $2 Billion (I think that's the number I've heard). So getting to the moon will not cost any where near $112 Billion.
    Perhaps, but the logistics of travelling to Mars are exponentially more complex than travelling to the moon, so yes, a fair bit of wheel re-inventing is necessary.

    As I said, it'll never happen.
    The science and technology simply doesn't currently exist to even begin to solve many of the problems associated with manned travel to Mars.
    “If everything's under control, you're going too slow.” Mario Andretti

  9. #29
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by schmenke
    As I said, it'll never happen.
    The science and technology simply doesn't currently exist to even begin to solve many of the problems associated with manned travel to Mars.
    Not so. We have the technology NOW to go to Mars if we so desired. The challenge is getting there without spending trillions.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Cowtown, Canada
    Posts
    13,789
    Like
    25
    Liked 82 Times in 63 Posts
    Sorry, yes, it is possible Mark, but certainly not feasible with our current technology.
    It would take an order of magnitude advanced leap in our current technology to make it feasible.
    So, as I said, it’ll never happen.
    “If everything's under control, you're going too slow.” Mario Andretti

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •