Results 41 to 50 of 293
-
1st February 2012, 17:03 #41
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by CNR
Sutil is upset with Lewis .
This must mean that he feels that the testimony would have helped his case .
This begs the question as to why Lewis , his friend , formerly , didn't attend .
Clearly , planes fly fast enough that Lewis would have been able to attend both the trial and the new car launch , so , why wasn't he there ?
Lewis's father sent a message , but Lewis , himself , went so far as to change his number .
Dad , seemingly , was not "in the loop" .
This is very curious , as Sutil calls him out as "not a man" in the quote , perhaps alluding to some kind of pressure from someone or somewhere to not show up .
Earlier reports about the upcoming trial stated that Lewis would be there , so they were either false , or something changed Lewis's mind .
From Sutil's tone , it seems to have been at the last minute .
So , who's pulling the Lewis strings , and what is providing the pressure point that made him abandon his friend ?
-
1st February 2012, 17:25 #42
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,778
- Like
- 3
- Liked 50 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagwan
Anyone famous needs to be associated with someone accused of stabbing another in the neck like a hole in the head. It would have been PR suicide for Lewis or anyone else with a reputation that could be damaged to have been involved.
Its not nice, its not pleasant but there's a level in society above which friendship won't survive one of the parties being accused of a violent crime. In this case Lewis was advised well.
Having said all that I do get the feeling that after the court case we the public know little more than we did before it.
-
1st February 2012, 17:41 #43
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Now , I just read that Hamilton , at the launch , was asked about Sutil's words , and was interrupted by a "handler" , who said he shouldn't answer , as the case could come under appeal .
So , as presumably Lewis was there in support of Sutil , who was convicted of the offence , what could the reason be to not react to the comments ?
Surely , cowardice implies that it must have been more than being afraid to stand before a judge .
It must mean one of two things .
Could it be that Lewis was going to lie about the situation to the judge ?
Or , could it be that Lewis was being pressured by someone to not attend ?
If it was pressure , who from ?
Clearly , Sutil believes he knows which one it was .
And , clearly , he would not be bringing up the subject if it was about Lewis lying , as this would not help in any appeal .
Lewis was also asked about this being his year to renew his contract , and spoke about how he expected to have talks around two or three races into the season , to clear things up .
Sutil's comments coming at him during the new car launch can't feel good .
Somehow , I don't think this will remain as quiet as some wish it would .
-
1st February 2012, 18:01 #44
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by Malbec
Now he is branded a "coward" and not reacting to the moniker .
Sure , you don't show up for OJ , but not for your friend ?
And , not just to be able to say it was , in your view , an accidental occurance ?
How would this put you in a bad light ?
Sutil was there to celebrate the Lewis victory .
There's more to this , and they are afraid , it's seems true , that it will stick to Lewis .
I believe they will summon Lewis to the appeal with a more mandatory tone .
-
1st February 2012, 18:09 #45
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by henners88
Surely , Lewis could have supplied that much with a statement .
Sutil seemed angry enough that he felt that Lewis being there would have made all the difference .
His choice of the word "coward" says he was wronged , and that Lewis was not brave enough to testify .
My question is , "why" ?
-
1st February 2012, 19:48 #46
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Oh good. Another opportunity to have a dig at Hamilton There's nothing new under the sun.
Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
1st February 2012, 21:37 #47
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
And , if it wasn't , I apologise , and ask why you might think Sutil was calling out a coward here .
Rather than roll your eyes , why not contribute in a more constructive way ?
-
1st February 2012, 21:52 #48
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by henners88
But Adam Cooper , having seen the CCTV footage seems to paint it as Sutil being "rail-roaded" .
And , Sutil seems rather more than mad about his friend abandoning him because it didn't go the way he wanted .
He seems to be saying , from the intensity , the Hamilton testimony could have been crucial .
Am I bashing here ?
-
2nd February 2012, 00:47 #49
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 1,002
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This case really is getting strange. I really don't know which side to believe - did Hamilton not witness it or is he just trying to save bad publicity and drop his friend right in it? How on earth did Sutil end up bottling a Genii exec anyway???
I'm not a Hamilton-basher by the way, he's certainly no saint but I think he's come in for more flack over various things than he was really due. But whatever Sutil did that night, something doesn't sound right about him avoiding the court!
-
2nd February 2012, 03:28 #50
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 2,386
- Like
- 0
- Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
OK i hope this is not another liegate for lewis
Sutil bats off Lux questions, 'concentrating on the racing' | Page 2 | F1 News | May 2011 | Crash.Net
It has also been revealed that McLaren-Mercedes star Lewis Hamilton – who was similarly present in the nightclub as he celebrated his Chinese Grand Prix victory, his first of the F1 2011 campaign – could be summoned by the prosecution to give evidence in an eventual trial. The Briton would concede only that 'I've been advised not to say anything'.
F1 driver Sutil brands Hamilton a coward
former world champion Hamilton did not give evidence in the trial on Monday and Tuesday. Instead, the Briton provided a written statement to say he did not see the incident.VERSTAPPEN: ‘If I’d let Sainz past, dad would’ve kicked me in the nuts!’
https://youtu.be/Fos6SRMMcsQ?si=ARtw4oWill16aqjd
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...