Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Ride Height Management - Lotus Renault Innovation?

    Is this the next 'must have' gizmo? Has Lotus Renault found this year or will it fail as spectacularly as the forward facing exhaust?
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,386
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
    is this real or an early april fools joke ?

    Has Lotus Renault found this year
    known as Renault, that helped to win it the 2006/6 world championships.
    One of the few technical rule changes for this year is the lowering of the nose of the car from a maximum of 62cm to 55cm,
    2012: Nose height Regulations | Scarbsf1's Blog
    2012: Nose height Regulations
    TWG and FIA have agreed a two step reduction on nose height. When we talk of noses there are two elements to this. Firstly the nose tip, this is the very visible, end of the nose cone structure. Then secondly the front bulkhead (referred to by the FIA as section A-A), this is where the nose cone mounts to the chassis.
    This reduction in height starts in 2012 with the front bulkhead limited to a 55cm height and then in 2014 the nose tip must fit into a zone 25cm high.
    VERSTAPPEN: ‘If I’d let Sainz past, dad would’ve kicked me in the nuts!’

  3. #3
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Old Lotus had ride-height adjustment in the 98T in 1986 and computer controlled ride-height adjustment in the 99T in 1987.

    This is an innovation? If it is it must the like the invention of concrete which the Romans had but was lost for 1200 years until 1670.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Looks like it's a goer - fully legal.

    Interesting that another 'front runner' has a similar system in development/ready for use this year......
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Back in the 80's a lot of motorcycles had "anti dive forks" that linked the brake system to the suspension. Conceptually similar, though those acted on the dampers rather than the suspension links.

    I wonder how easy this will be for competitors to copy. It doesn't seem to me like the sort of thing you'd have to change your whole aerodynamic concept to benefit from, but I could be wrong.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyL
    I wonder how easy this will be for competitors to copy..
    It's all about packaging. If your concept is not designed from the outset with an idea in mind that takes up space, it is a bugger shoehorning it in.....
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SGWilko
    It's all about packaging. If your concept is not designed from the outset with an idea in mind that takes up space, it is a bugger shoehorning it in.....
    But the packaging is pretty much all in the brake assembly - my guess would be redesigning that will have much less effect on the overall aerodynamic concept than something like a different wing, diffuser or rake angle.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyL
    But the packaging is pretty much all in the brake assembly - my guess would be redesigning that will have much less effect on the overall aerodynamic concept than something like a different wing, diffuser or rake angle.
    Sure, but if it does not 'fit' with your brake cooling concept, then you have to re-design the whole kit and kaboodle. What about suspension geometry etc. Not just a plug and play episode, not by a long chalk.
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,744
    Like
    145
    Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
    Very interesting. Let's see if this gamble pays off better and Lotus can actually make a positive impression during 2012.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •