Page 279 of 747 FirstFirst ... 179229269277278279280281289329379 ... LastLast
Results 2,781 to 2,790 of 7468
  1. #2781
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,090
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Is engine still made by Oreca? I thought they fell out and the engine was now in house?

  2. #2782
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    180
    Like
    16
    Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
    Photos from the interior?

  3. #2783
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,513
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,164 Times in 4,433 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    Is engine still made by Oreca? I thought they fell out and the engine was now in house?
    I think that the engine was developed in cooperation of Škoda Motoring center and Oreca but I don't know that for sure.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  4. #2784
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,134
    Like
    316
    Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    I think that the engine was developed in cooperation of Škoda Motoring center and Oreca but I don't know that for sure.
    I only know for sure some part of development was made by Oreca, but don't know if it was only small help for Skoda or complete engine development.

  5. #2785
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    368
    Like
    114
    Liked 84 Times in 59 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    About transmission last thing I heard was X-Trac but they tried also Ricardo and I'm not sure about the final decision. Dampers are Sachs as Dimviii pointed out. They started with Reiger but later switched to Sachs. I think they run Barum on Reigers. Brakes are Brembo as somebody already wrote. ECU I have no idea.
    why run Barum on Reiger? Is that based on a better past experience on that bumpy surface ?

  6. #2786
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,513
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,164 Times in 4,433 Posts
    They started with Reiger because Reiger supplied dampers for the S2000. Only later they switched to Sachs. I think the change happened only after Barum.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  7. #2787
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,090
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Reiger were always awesome on bumpy, jumpy tarmac (think Ireland too).

    I presume they must have some disadvantage on other surfaces though if Skoda don't use them for the R5?

  8. #2788
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,098
    Like
    9,931
    Liked 16,097 Times in 6,986 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    Reiger were always awesome on bumpy, jumpy tarmac (think Ireland too).

    I presume they must have some disadvantage on other surfaces though if Skoda don't use them for the R5?
    no they dont have disadvantage,is just easier to rebuild/have spares parts for 1 make of shocks,easier to co operate with one company when changes are nessesary etc.
    probably they prefered sachs like the mother vw as a German product.Not a bad decision as we saw from polo at all surfaces.

  9. #2789
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,585
    Like
    1,913
    Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
    I don't think that Reiger is that much better for bumpy stages. Cars like Fiesta WRC/S2000/R5 and Fabia S2000 were part of a revolution in terms of suspension geometry, allowing the spring travel to be extremely big. I think it's more coincidence that those cars were having Reiger suspension. In R2-class for example Fabia R2 runs on Reiger too, and when it comes to bumpy surfaces it's probably the worst of the class... VW Polo WRC runs on Sachs too. It's likely Skoda can take advantage of the dampers and knowledge developed by VW/Sachs in WRC. And in WRC in the suspension-part nothing beats the Polo, it really "eats" the rough sections and bumps where others (especially DS3) are losing some time.

  10. Likes: dimviii (16th April 2015)
  11. #2790
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,513
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,164 Times in 4,433 Posts
    Somebody was interested in interior photos. Here they are: http://www.auto.cz/jizdni-dojmy-ze-s...12/foto?foto=0

    If I see right, the electronics is Magnetti Marelli.

    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  12. Likes: dimviii (16th April 2015),Jeppe (16th April 2015),Micke_VOC (16th April 2015),Munkvy (24th April 2015),polo10 (16th April 2015),WUff1 (16th April 2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •