So if you are going to murder someone make sure your parents are rich

[Bolton Midnight]

So guilty or innocent, regardless of the resources at your disposal, you would bet your life on a court appointed attorney when your live twists in the wind? Put yourself and family in the situation of defending yourself. Would they not do the same if they believed in your innocence? They were convicted on inconclusive evidence that was inentionally misrepresented as conclusinve DNA evidence. The prosecution admitted this. I don't know whathte burden of proof is in Italy, but the outcome says they did not satisfy that burden.

No as I'd not lie and I'd not murder an innocent girl so my DNA wouldn't be on the murder weapon, unlike Knox's.

Well I for one am confused.

On the one hand there's the 20,000 pages of evidence linking Knox and her boyfriend to the crime.

But on the other hand, The Sun reckons she's "foxy".

I just don't know what to believe.

Oh aye she's worth a go on for sure, but best chuck her out afterwards or sleep with one eye open as she may murder you and then get off with it again.

All in all, the people that are the most likely to be believed in this are the Kercher family and they have said that what looked like an overwhelming conviction has now been comprehensibly overturned, that they respect the decision of the Italian judiciary and left them back to square one.

Either they are unbelievably magnanimous or they really are in doubt as to Knox's and Sollecito's guilt and I will go with them I think.

So when are they nipping over to Seattle for tea and buns?

Nope they want answers and justice, and for that to happen Knox & her chap need banging up again.

[CarlMetro]

Where as I am just bored of this one now, how do you unsubscribe to a thread again?

[Bolton Midnight]

Where as I am just bored of this one now, how do you unsubscribe to a thread again?

Stop clicking on it would be a start

[Bolton Midnight]

copied from elsewhere, about wraps this one up - GUILTY

Evidence for RG:
- extensive RG DNA, bloody handprints and footprints
- confessed to being at the scene
- seen by eye witnesses leaving the scene

Evidence for multiple assailants:
- coroner testified physical evidence of injuries consistent with multiple attackers
- MK suffered 47 injuries, strangled, tortured, stabbed, neck broken, head smashed against wall, sexually assaulted, left to bleed to death, but minor defensive wounds, bruising on both wrists, indicates MK was restrained
- knife wounds from different blades, mixture of deep cuts and minor lacerations, indicates multiple attackers and extended torture
- RG bloody handprints everywhere but no RG blood on MK's mobile phones found discarded in park
- smaller/woman's footprint on MK bedsheet not matched to RG

Evidence for murder involving AK/RS:
- coroner indicated multiple assailants, RG/AK/RS DNA found at the murder scene, and no evidence of another third party
- knife with AK/MK DNA found at RS flat, recently cleaned with bleach (only partial match to injuries)
- inconsistencies in AK/RS testimony on the night of the murder, both changed their stories, RS lied about using computer
- suspicious behaviour when crime scene discovered (delayed opening MK door and contacting flatmates/police for several hours)
- MK body moved several hours after death, indicates assailants returned to scene but RG seen at nightclub shortly after murder
- MK bra removed after death, bra clasp cut, recovered from scene later, RS/AK DNA found on bra clasp (no RG DNA on the clasp)
- evidence of partial cleanup (hall and bathroom floor, bloody towels, no AK DNA in AK bedroom), but RG evidence not removed
- fake break-in (glass on top of clothes/PC strewn on floor) indicates someone let RG into flat and AK/RS covering their tracks
- mixed AK/MK blood found in bathroom, AK/RS bloody footprints in bathroom and hall (but RS footprint dubious)
- witnesses Antonio Curatolo and Hekuran Kokomani placed AK/RS/RG at the scene and saw AK/RS arguing outside late evening
- AK initial confession places her at the scene (but not admissible)
- appeal Judge Claudio Pratillo Hellmann said he believes AK/RS responsible even though acquitted

[Bob Riebe]

copied from elsewhere, about wraps this one up - GUILTY

Evidence for RG:
- extensive RG DNA, bloody handprints and footprints
- confessed to being at the scene
- seen by eye witnesses leaving the scene

Evidence for multiple assailants:
- coroner testified physical evidence of injuries consistent with multiple attackers
- MK suffered 47 injuries, strangled, tortured, stabbed, neck broken, head smashed against wall, sexually assaulted, left to bleed to death, but minor defensive wounds, bruising on both wrists, indicates MK was restrained
- knife wounds from different blades, mixture of deep cuts and minor lacerations, indicates multiple attackers and extended torture
- RG bloody handprints everywhere but no RG blood on MK's mobile phones found discarded in park
- smaller/woman's footprint on MK bedsheet not matched to RG

Evidence for murder involving AK/RS:
- coroner indicated multiple assailants, RG/AK/RS DNA found at the murder scene, and no evidence of another third party
- knife with AK/MK DNA found at RS flat, recently cleaned with bleach (only partial match to injuries)
- inconsistencies in AK/RS testimony on the night of the murder, both changed their stories, RS lied about using computer
- suspicious behaviour when crime scene discovered (delayed opening MK door and contacting flatmates/police for several hours)
- MK body moved several hours after death, indicates assailants returned to scene but RG seen at nightclub shortly after murder
- MK bra removed after death, bra clasp cut, recovered from scene later, RS/AK DNA found on bra clasp (no RG DNA on the clasp)
- evidence of partial cleanup (hall and bathroom floor, bloody towels, no AK DNA in AK bedroom), but RG evidence not removed
- fake break-in (glass on top of clothes/PC strewn on floor) indicates someone let RG into flat and AK/RS covering their tracks
- mixed AK/MK blood found in bathroom, AK/RS bloody footprints in bathroom and hall (but RS footprint dubious)
- witnesses Antonio Curatolo and Hekuran Kokomani placed AK/RS/RG at the scene and saw AK/RS arguing outside late evening
- AK initial confession places her at the scene (but not admissible)
- appeal Judge Claudio Pratillo Hellmann said he believes AK/RS responsible even though acquitted

Give your source other wise this is bs.

[Bolton Midnight]

No it isn't bs, it is from a number of sources compiled by somebody else.

A link doesn't mean it is true you know, doh.

[CarlMetro]

Stop clicking on it would be a start

it was a genuine question, doesn't stop it appearing in my inbox donkey brain.......

[Bolton Midnight]

What a strange world you must live in when you can only believe the Guardian, nice to see you are so out of touch though; who knows one day you may wake up and join the real world.

[Bolton Midnight]

There has to be some explanation as to why you are so out of touch with the majority. Do you use mind altering drugs per chance? Or is it just the usual vested interest?

[ArrowsFA1]

There has to be some explanation as to why you are so out of touch with the majority...

Just to remind you, in the 2011 general election the Tories got 36.1% of the vote.

What majority are you referring to?