Results 1 to 10 of 283
Thread: Matthew Wilson in Autosport
-
7th April 2011, 10:00 #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 230
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Matthew Wilson in Autosport
Sorry if there's another Wilson thread somewhere, but my head just exploded:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/90480
Is he having a laugh? And Autosport, he doesn't become any better because you twist the facts! Extraordinary.
-
7th April 2011, 10:13 #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 36
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I read it! I don't know why the rally-journalists are so stupid or just refuse to see the facts! As stated before in another thread the wrc-journalist have become friends with the drivers, and that is awfull to see in wrc.com and autosport!
-
7th April 2011, 10:19 #3
I don't see why you've got an issue with the journalist. Most of the article is just a quote from Wilson, the main bulk of what the journo has actually written is:
Wilson is enjoying his most competitive season to datetrue, having run fourth on the last two rounds of the WRC.true
He is seventh in the championshiptrue after steering problems cost him time on the opening round of the series in Swedentrue (he finished ninthtrue), he retired with electrical trouble in Mexicotrue and finished fifth last time out in Portugaltrue.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
7th April 2011, 10:44 #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 36
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As a journalist he should no only tell the obvious story, but also the story behind. Yes Wilson was fourth on the last two rounds but that
was ONLY because of others misfortune. He was not in the fight.
Generelly the journalist at wrc.com and autosport (especially wrc.com) don't ask the interesting questions. One for Wilson could be: "You have been in the WRC for five season in a competitive car and we have NEVER seen any pace. And yet you are talking about a factory team....Why?"
-
7th April 2011, 12:07 #5Originally Posted by Lundgaard
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...in-401487.html
And why highlight that his 4th came from others demise? Rallying is all about getting to the end of the event, if you can't do that then you don't get points. Ogier came 4th in Sweden because Solberg got caught for speeding, yet I doubt interviewers (or fans) were clamouring to tell Seb that fact. The truth of the matter is that people just don't like Matt Wilson, so anything about him will get torn apart by people as a matter of course.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
7th April 2011, 12:29 #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 230
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
And good on BBC for doing it. We need independent journalism, not mothpieces that might as well work for their PR department. I thought Autosport was supposed to be a professional magazine (it was back in the day), but I guess I was wrong. Do they need to verbally rip him apart in the interview? Obviously not. But it's embarrasingly positive - "Wilson's speed has improved with the switch to 1600cc World Rally Cars" (It has?) and "enjoying his most competitive season yet" (I thought competitive was being a part of the action, tootling around and collecting points when others fall off).
-
7th April 2011, 12:30 #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Zürich, CH
- Posts
- 1,851
- Like
- 1
- Liked 49 Times in 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Lundgaard
I have made a little comparison between Matthew Wilson, Conrad Rautenbach and Frederico Villagra, because people in here tend to ask why people weren't/aren't giving those two drivers the same critism. For me it's about the amount of WRC rallies Matthew Wilson has done in a WRC car compared with the two others.
Matthew Wilson has done 77 rallies with one 4th place as his best result and six 5th places.
Conrad Rautenbach did 28 rallies in a WRC car with one 4th and one 5th place as his best results.
Frederico Villagra has done 35 rallies with two 4th places as his best results.
So what should be apparant now is that Matthew Wilson has done more WRC events in a high spec Ford Focus WRC car that the two other drivers combined - without getting near a podium, and without progesing in tearms of results or speed. It's simply beyond me why there isn't more critism of such a poor driver (maybe the worst WRC driver of all times) who keeps getting such a good car without delivering results. I find it embarresing that Malcom Wilson keeps rediculing the WRC with his son getting a drive he clearly doesn't deserve and he should instead use that car for a future talent and to help Ford in their fight for both titles.Supporting Ogier in the WRC & Ferrari in F1 & Ducati in MotoGP.
-
7th April 2011, 12:33 #8
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Zürich, CH
- Posts
- 1,851
- Like
- 1
- Liked 49 Times in 28 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullaloveSupporting Ogier in the WRC & Ferrari in F1 & Ducati in MotoGP.
-
7th April 2011, 12:36 #9Originally Posted by Jimmy Magnusson
And yes the BBC did well, but they've got 19 other managers that they can speak to, if Autosport piss off Malcolm Wilson in the same way then all of a sudden they can only speak to 4 drivers until Mini turn up.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
7th April 2011, 12:39 #10Originally Posted by MikeD
And don't go thinking that if Matt Wilson wasn't in WRC that someone else would be, that seat would disappear along with Stobart.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
1 Neuville 2 Rovanperä 3 Tänak 4 Ogier 5 Sordo 6 Fourmaux 7 Evans 8 Suninen FordSon
WRC PICKEMS 2024 - Round 5 RALLY...