Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    I've no idea how much they are spending on CFD TBH but I do remember reading, around the time of Marussia's investment in the team, that they were building a state of the art facility - 3rd largest in the world if I remember correctly - and that ain't going to come cheap.
    All other opinions are wrong....

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleeper
    I suspect Lotus will leave them behind, Wirth seems to be the only person that believes CFD can handle the exceptionally complex aero modelling without a windtunnel to corelate the data.
    Well, in Valencia last week Timo Glock, in the 2010 Virgin, was a mere 0.2s slower than Massa's 2011 Ferrari
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    South Shields, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,671
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
    Well, in Valencia last week Timo Glock, in the 2010 Virgin, was a mere 0.2s slower than Massa's 2011 Ferrari
    And that from what I heard had quite a few 2011 components on it
    "Alboreto, into the pits, and im going to stop the startwatch" (Murray Walker, Monaco 1987)

  4. #14
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
    Well, in Valencia last week Timo Glock, in the 2010 Virgin, was a mere 0.2s slower than Massa's 2011 Ferrari
    Quote Originally Posted by DazzlaF1
    And that from what I heard had quite a few 2011 components on it
    So with the complete 2011 car Virgin should be lapping the field

    Seriously though it would be great to see Virgin and Team Lotus catch and hopefully mix it with the pack.

    As for HRT I can't see them being much faster in comparison to other teams than last year. However I hope I am proved wrong.
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    2,171
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic
    In the automotive world perhaps. But I think I am right in saying that Scaled Composites (makers of spaceship one and now virgin galactic's spaceship two - VSS Enterprise) didn't once go within spitting distance of a wind tunnel, designed exclusively on computers. So there is a precedence for this technology allowing the little guys to take on the big cheese on equal footings.
    And I bet they spent a hell of a lot more than £40million, Virgins total budget, on the facilities, the R&D and and the development of the simulation softwere, not to mentiopn they would have had a lead time of years, far longer than any F1 car ever gets. Chalk and cheese comparison.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleeper
    And I bet they spent a hell of a lot more than £40million, Virgins total budget, on the facilities, the R&D and and the development of the simulation softwere, not to mentiopn they would have had a lead time of years, far longer than any F1 car ever gets. Chalk and cheese comparison.
    You may be right, certainly on the lead time and familiarity with the software, but a quick google search suggests a budget of around the $25 million mark. How accurate that is I've no idea, but my guess is it can't be far off the mark - the X prize was only $10 million so its already a pretty big budget shortfall for a small private company to find.

    Chalk and cheese? Definitely. But there are no other automotive examples - and that's kind of the point.
    All other opinions are wrong....

  7. #17
    Blimey, 20 Years Azumanga Davo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,089
    Like
    2
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    http://marussiavirginracing.com/car/...ide-the-mvr-02

    It's quite simplistic at best, which might bode well for them. I'll say one thing though, it's a very tidy and elegant looking car, that's for sure.

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,821
    Like
    2,088
    Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Doorslammer
    http://marussiavirginracing.com/car/...ide-the-mvr-02

    I'll say one thing though, it's a very tidy and elegant looking car, that's for sure.
    I agree, as was last years. Much prettier than the ugly gangster batmobile Red Bull thing, although I am not sure that will reflect in speed on the track!

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    A logical progression from lasts years car incorporating many of the themes of the last 18 months. It's interesting that they alone have gone for a reasonably low nose - is that the computers talking or simply a simple difference of design philosophy?
    All other opinions are wrong....

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    2,171
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I do like the look of the Virgin, but it is a very simple looking car compared to the Renault, Red Bull and especially the McLaren. I cant see this getting too much farther up the grid than the 01 did.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •