Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49
  1. #11
    Senior Member Tazio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    15,380
    Like
    1,117
    Liked 644 Times in 509 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikki Katz
    Hmm, I'll really have to wait to see what the results of the cleaner driving initiative are. There are cases when this is really a good idea - it seems to have become acceptable this season to cut a corner to keep a car from overtaking you, which is completely wrong, and some of the (Schumacher) moves definitely need to be looked at harder.

    But I hope that this doesn't just penalise anyone making a slightly daring overtaking move - there's too little overtaking as there is, and it looks like overtaking in the pits is on the way out too.
    Not for Fred at Silverstone.
    But then again he is a specimen of pure evil! mokin:
    May the forza be with you

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    742
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Will be interesting to see how the "aggressive driving" rule is enforced. What are the penalties? Will these rules keep Schuey from running Rubens into a wall or Hulkenburg from cutting through numerous chicanes?

    My fear is that Kobayashi's spectacular overtaking will get penalized and a driver that actually adds excitement during a race will get be encouraged to play "follow-the-leader" like most everyone else.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    I find the aggressive driving rule slightly silly, they would not have to implement the rule so forcefully if kerbs actually punished vehicles that mounted them. Kerbs in the 60's especially were tyres that were mounted into the ground that would rip the cars wheels right off should drivers get overly aggressive with them. As it is now, with tarmac runoff, the distinction between the circuit and runoff is more or less the white line which carries minimal consequence, which causes more aggressive driving on behalf of everyone. Fix that and the need for rules like this will be greatly reduced.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Alcatraz
    Not for Fred at Silverstone.
    But then again he is a specimen of pure evil! mokin:
    But he was the one passing Kubica, an important distinction worth making. Which brings up another point. That, in a way, set a precedent that forcing a car off the road to maintain position is okay, because the driver who cuts across the chicane will have to concede position anyway.

    Which again ties into one of the negative effects of kerbs that don't punish. Drivers would be more likely to give racing room knowing that the driver attempting to overtake would find it more convenient to stay on the circuit at risk of running into the defending driver rather than cut across the run-off area(usually tarmac) to try again later in the race.

  5. #15
    Senior Member Tazio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    15,380
    Like
    1,117
    Liked 644 Times in 509 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
    But he was the one passing Kubica, an important distinction worth making. Which brings up another point. That, in a way, set a precedent that forcing a car off the road to maintain position is okay, because the driver who cuts across the chicane will have to concede position anyway.

    Which again ties into one of the negative effects of kerbs that don't punish. Drivers would be more likely to give racing room knowing that the driver attempting to overtake would find it more convenient to stay on the circuit at risk of running into the defending driver rather than cut across the run-off area(usually tarmac) to try again later in the race.
    Duh!!!
    My bad!!!!!
    The backmarker moving over is a good aspect of this rule as long as it is possible to enforce it in all situations evenly.
    May the forza be with you

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Great explanation of the new technical regs on Craig Scarborough's blog:
    http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2010/1...and-explained/

    Looks like even passive F-ducts are effectively banned with the tighter restrictions on slotted rear wings.

  7. #17
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    Thanks! No wonder all cars look the same when the rules are this strict!
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  8. #18
    Senior Member edv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    3,785
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ioan
    Who decided this idiotic rule?!
    If you've used both specs of tires, that means you've made the pit stop and lost 20-30 seconds to those who have not yet stopped.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ioan
    Who decided this idiotic rule?!
    Awful. It's a stupid rule to regulate against their other stupid rules. Just get rid of the mandatory tyre switch.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by edv
    If you've used both specs of tires, that means you've made the pit stop and lost 20-30 seconds to those who have not yet stopped.
    True, but the rule is nontheless hitherto extremely unfair and skewed for any car/driver combination who is very tyre sympathetic and can make the set they started the race on last. If they were planning on making a last gasp late stop, the rule has no allowance for this.
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •