Over MS' No.1 position in the team (no such in the contract)

[Dzeidzei]

Ron and Norbert said that they think KR will stay at McLaren for most of last season too, are they also liars?
Did you ever think that they all knew the truth but for commercial reasons couldn't say it?

Last year Rubens declared that he had no No 2 clause and got equal equipment from Ferrari when he was already a Honda man, did he lie too?

Don't measure the truth with 2 different weight sets.

Ron and Norbert liars? Absolutely. They knew it all when they signed Alonso. And youre spot on the reason: if youre looking or negotiating a new sponsor you sure as hell wont say that youre loosing a top driver.

Rubens didnt have to have No2 clause, if Michael had No1 clause
And just FYI on F1 driver mentality: they all think they are the fastest out there. They will never admit being 2nd class material. Never. Just remember what Ralf said a few days ago being one of the top 3 drivers. Has he gone mental? No, he really believes that.

And your last comment I dont even begin to analyze. You are talking about thruth, Im talking about facts. Your truth seems to deny and contradict every possible fact. And that should not be called a truth, cause theres a much better word for it. Faith.

And I still cant get it: why is having no1 status such a bad thing? Id love the Finnish guys to be in a position, where they can make such a claim.

[ioan]

And I still cant get it: why is having no1 status such a bad thing? Id love the Finnish guys to be in a position, where they can make such a claim.

No one said it's a bad thing, just that he earned it with his driving not on the contract.

I've had enough arguing with people who seem to not read and understand (or do not want to) my posts, but only reply because of their opposite beliefs.

[VresiBerba]

You're farting against thunder ioan. Too many idiots, not enough common sense

And we idiots of course dreamt about Austria 2002

[VresiBerba]

I bet you have no proof that it was in his team mate's contract!

And I bet you have no proof that it wasn't!

[VresiBerba]

Actually MS had better equipment only 2 times, he had the F2003 GA and the F 2005, earlier than RB.

Only two times How many times is the norm, how many times have ANY other team done this in the past ten years?

[ArrowsFA1]

It twirls around
It spins around
It whirls around
It never stops!

pin: pinhead:

[Viv]

It twirls around
It spins around
It whirls around
It never stops!

pin: pinhead:

So true

[janneppi]

I've had enough arguing with people who seem to not read and understand (or do not want to) my posts, but only reply because of their opposite beliefs.

Would you prefer to argue with people who completely agree with you and post only to strenghten your points? :

[ioan]

Would you prefer to argue with people who completely agree with you and post only to strenghten your points? :

No, no, no!

But some people should and could read and try to understand a post before replying to it ( and I'm not talking about you! ).

[ioan]

Only two times How many times is the norm, how many times have ANY other team done this in the past ten years?

What if 1 out of those 2 times RB didn't want to get the new equipment? I might be wrong but I recall that in Bahrain 2005 he chose to go with the old car.

As for RB's contract he said it last year that it was no no.2 clause in it, happy now? BTW if you want a link you'll have to google it.