Thread: DS3 WRC launch Sept 30th
-
6th December 2010, 22:13 #81
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Casper, WY
- Posts
- 323
- Like
- 66
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Gard
Nice!!! That would be cost cutting right? Anti-lag just adds wear to the turbo correct?2009 Colorado Rally Cup Champion & 2009 CHCA Rookie Of the Year
-
6th December 2010, 22:39 #82
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 1,468
- Like
- 1
- Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Gard
Yes, it's difficult, but IMHO it's also pain in the ass for the drivers. No enjoyment from the driving, just pumping the throttle and brakes like Matthew. Not good for anyone.Satakymppi, oikee yks
-
6th December 2010, 22:42 #83
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,834
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
Originally Posted by TyPat107
For me it's ok with lower boost. For spectators more boost brings nothing positive. I would prefer larger restrictor (even instead of direct injection). That's the simpliest solution which costs nothing.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
6th December 2010, 23:15 #84
Lower boost means higher revs compared with higher boost which mean nicer sound with the same restrictor size.
“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
6th December 2010, 23:40 #85
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Casper, WY
- Posts
- 323
- Like
- 66
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Lower boost could also mean higher compression ratio which sounds more crisp.
2009 Colorado Rally Cup Champion & 2009 CHCA Rookie Of the Year
-
8th December 2010, 07:36 #86
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 54
- Like
- 0
- Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
sounds good. very good. i like the extra revs, just gives it a bit more intensity than the old wrc's, so i think these things will sounds great through the forest.
-
9th December 2010, 02:15 #87
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Posts
- 170
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks faster than the Ford or Mini, but I guess what do you expect when they've probably double the budget of the other 2 teams put together. I was really hoping that Ford would be able to take it to Citroen next year, but if this is anything to go by ..... :-(
Mark Kent - The older I get, the faster I was
-
9th December 2010, 04:20 #88
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 1,500
- Like
- 74
- Liked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Money buys time, hopefully Ford can still be up there.
-
9th December 2010, 13:18 #89
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Posts
- 7,892
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Remember that it is not Ford. It is M Sport which is a private team at the end of the day. They will have a tighter budget than Manufacturer Citroen.
Nav
-
9th December 2010, 14:03 #90
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 606
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by navtheace
Hamilton to Ferrari move questioned by former F1 boss Ecclestone. "Too much of a handful - an unneccessary handful." Ecclestone has claimed, he would not have signed the likes of a Hamilton during...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...