What were the reasons for Silverstones exit?

[daz90]

I read the artikle in Autosport, and from what i gathered the BTCC organisers are still waiting for a reply from Silverstone on wheather or not they will accept the date, no final decision made yet?

Might be me getting it wrong though.

As for Rockingham, thats not at all far from Silverstone, and very near kettering i think. So for me atleast its very close.

[Tomski]

Am I the only person who finds Silverstone a bleak, open, and impersonnal. Your miles from the action thanks to all the F1 safety fencing & runoff area's you might as well be at home.

Before someone mentions this season finale crowds, I feel they would have gone to whichever circuit was hosting the last round.

[daz90]

Alot of people had free tickets for the final round, so that boosted the gate. But yes your right it is a bit of a bleak place.

[Ur not a salmon]

Am I the only person who finds Silverstone a bleak, open, and impersonnal. Your miles from the action thanks to all the F1 safety fencing & runoff area's you might as well be at home.

And sitting so far up from the ground at Rockingham that you feel nauseous, plus having to use binoculars if you want to see anything is better?

[acorn]

And sitting so far up from the ground at Rockingham that you feel nauseous, plus having to use binoculars if you want to see anything is better?

sounds like you need to see a doctor about your vertigo(no higher than the upperlevels at twickenham) and an optometrist about your restricted vision.

[Ur not a salmon]

I think you might need to see an optometrist as well, those rose tinted spectacles are clearly causing you some problems.

[Hazell B]

And sitting so far up from the ground at Rockingham that you feel nauseous, plus having to use binoculars if you want to see anything is better?

Having spent time in the grandstands at both tracks, the distance is probably less at Rockingham than Silverstone from seated bottom to track most of the time. Plus, you can see far more of the track at Rockingham than any seat in Silverstone.

Anyway, I read on teletext yesterday that Alan Gow wrote to Silverstone some time ago saying his calendar simply didn't fit in with Silverstone's, so he would not be using them this year. Silverstone then went to the racing media saying they were "shocked and at a loss ...." as to why they had been dropped. By yesterday, they had admitted getting the letter from Gow after all. No idea why their people had slightly stretched the truth about not knowing they'd been dropped, but it's probably as much a misunderstanding as anything.

On a different note, Silverstone are claiming to have already sold record numbers of GP tickets on the back of Jenson Button's win last season. Yeah, sure they have - just like they claim to have almost sold out every year before offering cut price deals .....

[Dave B]

Silverstone is a terrible circuit to spectate at, yet usually produces great racing.

[AndySpeed]

On a different note, Silverstone are claiming to have already sold record numbers of GP tickets on the back of Jenson Button's win last season. Yeah, sure they have - just like they claim to have almost sold out every year before offering cut price deals .....

Quite simply a marketing tactic. People following other people, not wanting to miss out, so obviously the promoter tries to instill a hyperbolic sense of urgency or popularity about the event.

[Hazell B]

Quite simply a marketing tactic. People following other people, not wanting to miss out, so obviously the promoter tries to instill a hyperbolic sense of urgency or popularity about the event.

I know, but it sounds sadder each year, especially when they start in November. Why don't they just tell the truth? I mean, saying "Buy a ticket and Jensen may just win for you" is just as rewarding sales-wise as "They're selling like mad because Jens won one" when it's clearly this year's sales lie.

Put it this way, a non-GP fan I know laughed out loud at the quote in his paper. He could smell the bullplop a mile off!