Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Saint Devote
    The whole argument involves aerodynamics - problem is unless there is an outright banning of aero, which would destabilize the cars and make them extremely risky to drive
    I don't agree with this viewpoint - not if you specifically design a car without wings, diffuser etc.

    Obviously, if you take a current car and just lop off the wings it will be rather slow on the corners, but wicked quick on the straights!!!
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  2. #12
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    There is nothing about aero that makes it a requirement for safety. If anything it increases cornering speeds which actually makes the cars less safe!

    If you were to reduce downforce to zero, obviously the cars would have to go around the corners much more slowly, so the speed involved if you have an accident is thus much reduced.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mia 01
    I think Maclaren in the long term are doomed whitout Adrian Newey.

    The MP 22 & 23 was an evolution of his design. The MP 24 & 25 are dogs moore or less. No new WCC whitout Adrian I fear, when was the last time, -98?

    For now Adrian works for that awful drinks company, and their cars are beating the **** out off the MacLaren team. Even if they have the new Senna in the team nothing seems to help.

    Ron should call Adrian right now, perhaps he then can save the team.
    McLaren have been excellent. Even when they were behind the 8-ball at the start of last year they improved quite rapidly. Have no doubt - they are a top team, and performing just fine without Newey.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Leeds, England
    Posts
    2,972
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fandango
    It seems very strange that an aerodynamicist can have so much influence on whether a car is a winning car or not. I mean, when you think about it, the problems in F1 regarding overtaking are because of aerodynamics (the following car in the dirty air and all that) are well accepted, and yet we have a situation where there is an engine development freeze and a single tyre supplier (= very little tyre development).

    So if, for example, Ferrari want to catch up with Red Bull, they can't do it by strapping on a new engine with more power or improving their tyres. They have to improve their aerdynamics. Would not make more sense to have an aero freeze? Or better yet, let the teams decide which element they will freeze at the start of the year...
    Or even better, freeze nothing at all!

    I agree with the bulk of what you're saying though, F1 has boxed itself into this aero-is-all corner with the engine and tyre regs, and the rulemakers have nobody to blame but themselves. They try and blame the economy but that was in fairly rude health when the engines and tyres were neutered in the 2006/07 off-season.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,242
    Like
    1,069
    Liked 193 Times in 131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
    McLaren have been excellent. Even when they were behind the 8-ball at the start of last year they improved quite rapidly. Have no doubt - they are a top team, and performing just fine without Newey.
    Agreed on , they are a top team.

    Now when the engines no longer go booooom, the only thing they need is Adrian and Kimi.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Barcelona, Catalunya, Spa
    Posts
    3,029
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Saint Devote
    The whole argument involves aerodynamics - problem is unless there is an outright banning of aero, which would destabilize the cars and make them extremely risky to drive, the only way is to do it in current fashion.

    "Problem" is that there are such brilliant people working in f1 that they will innovate.......................................... .....

    Let the teams decide?! I think we went through that argument in 2009
    It's not the only way to do it. It's possible to limit the aero influence while at the same time using the talent of the "brilliant people" to re-inforce the situation.

    The concept is very simple:

    Downforce can be measured. The loss of downforce that happens to a car in "dirty" air can also be measured. So, let the "brilliant people" design whatever way they want, but with a limit to how much they disturb the air for other cars. The limit is clear, without the necessity for being cleverer than the designers.

    As for the development freeze, what I was saying was that perhaps they should make teams choose between freezing their aero development, their engine or their tyres. It would make for more variation in the designs, leading to more passing, different cars being stronger on different circuits. Remember the early 80s? Sometimes the turbos were quicker, sometimes the cosworths. The idea is just speculation....

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Leeds, England
    Posts
    2,972
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fandango
    As for the development freeze, what I was saying was that perhaps they should make teams choose between freezing their aero development, their engine or their tyres. It would make for more variation in the designs, leading to more passing, different cars being stronger on different circuits. Remember the early 80s? Sometimes the turbos were quicker, sometimes the cosworths. The idea is just speculation....
    Yep more design variety, or rather different teams having different strengths in different areas, is always a good thing. As recently as 1994, Benetton had the best driver (after Imola), Williams the best car, and Ferrari the best engine, which meant for instance at Hockenheim the form book got ripped up and Ferrari dominated in the middle of a season where they were generally a distant third in the pecking order. And this was when everyone was on the same tyres (although not by regulation).

    When you add tyres into the mix then there's countless examples of un-artificially shaking up the order when there's been a tyre war, Mexico 1986, Phoenix 1990, Barcelona and possibly Hungaroring 1997, the entire 2003 and 2005 seasons (including Indy - hey at least we got an unusual top 6 in that one), and so on.

    Yes, if there is to be a freeze then your idea would be infinitely better than what we have now, I just don't like the idea of freezing full-stop, in what is supposed to be a technical competition.

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fandango
    Downforce can be measured. The loss of downforce that happens to a car in "dirty" air can also be measured. So, let the "brilliant people" design whatever way they want, but with a limit to how much they disturb the air for other cars. The limit is clear, without the necessity for being cleverer than the designers.
    It's an interesting concept, but one issue I see is that when the rules are framed based on a particular method of measurement, the "brilliant people" will just find ways to make something that passes the test conditions, but behaves differently in the "real world". Think of the Ferrari sprung floor for example.
    I can imagine teams spending piles of cash coming up with designs that pass the FIA wind tunnel test, but generate much more turbulence for the following car when the driver is sitting in it, or when the engine's running, or at different speeds to what the FIA test at.
    Which is one reason why they invariably fall back on the blunt instrument of legislating on the causes (sizes of wings and diffusers etc.) rather than measuring effects.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Barcelona, Catalunya, Spa
    Posts
    3,029
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyL
    It's an interesting concept, but one issue I see is that when the rules are framed based on a particular method of measurement, the "brilliant people" will just find ways to make something that passes the test conditions, but behaves differently in the "real world". Think of the Ferrari sprung floor for example.
    I can imagine teams spending piles of cash coming up with designs that pass the FIA wind tunnel test, but generate much more turbulence for the following car when the driver is sitting in it, or when the engine's running, or at different speeds to what the FIA test at.
    Which is one reason why they invariably fall back on the blunt instrument of legislating on the causes (sizes of wings and diffusers etc.) rather than measuring effects.

    Yes, but that would be further down the road. There's always a simple way round these things, that's why, for example, they introduced the wooden plank on the bottom of the car.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Barcelona, Catalunya, Spa
    Posts
    3,029
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by V12
    ................I just don't like the idea of freezing full-stop, in what is supposed to be a technical competition.
    Nor do I, but F1 teams reached the limit of what's possible a long time ago, in terms of safety at the circuits. So from now on we'll have limits, a fact which we have to live with. The question is how to maintain the spectacle.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •