Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 52 of 52
  1. #51
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Where the sun shines.....
    Posts
    13
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze
    M-Sport must make money, Citroen can spent it.
    That is the difference !!
    Yep it sure does help when the french tax payers put sooo much money into their car companies, no wonder they can spend as much as they like on their motorsport programmes.........

    If they can't make money they should go bankrupt, oh wait citroen already did that in the seventies....

    http://www.nowpublic.com/world/peuge...nch-government

    http://www.caradvice.com.au/22928/vo...bail-out-plan/http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/09/ren..._autos_12.html


    Level playing field? my arse.........
    How good am I, just ask me! :)

  2. #52
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    IMO a Citroén can’t be compared to a Citroén and a Ford can’t be compared to another Ford and even more difficult it’s to compare Citroén with a Ford. Just look what Petter achieved with the Xsara and know what he’s doing whit the C4.

    I think the two cars have been designed with a quite different philosophy. The Citroén was designed for tarmac rallies and the Ford for gravel rallies but was I’ve read, it’s seems to better to design the car for tarmac and then adding to it the gravel specs.

    IMO the Citroén looks more agile compared to the Ford?
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •