There seems to be a lot of discussion about the current differences between the Citroen and Ford right now. Four events done and a pessimist would say that title challenges are finished. Citroen seems to have upper hand, quite clearly actually.

But what do you think? What makes the difference right now? Is 2009 spec C4 WRC clearly a better car than 2009 spec Focus WRC? Or are the Citroen drivers (Factory and Junior team) more superior compered to the Ford drivers (Munich and Stobart too)?

Mikko and Jari-Matti seems to lost some pace compared to Citroen. They have losted paced compared to last year or even 2008, espacially Latvala. Wilson has been slow always, so speaking of equipment in his case is inrellevant.

But what about Henning? I think that he had more pace in 2009 than now.

Reporter asked in Sweden 2010 from Marcus about the difference between his current Focus WRC compered to 2007 spec. He was actually suprised that how similar that car was and there wasn't really bigger deveploment to better or worse.