Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 165

Thread: Jon Venables

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    5,394
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Jon Venables

    Do you think the public (or the parents of James Bulger) have a right to know the reasons behind Jon Venables' return to custody?

    Personally, I don't believe it is in the public interest. It's an emotive subject though, because of the nature of the crime.

    Your views?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    No, they don't. Will Self's views as expressed on Question Time last night were absolutely right, too.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...me/8550915.stm

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    I agree.
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    I agree.

    People here are overly paranoid about their children. The strangest thing happened to me the other day....

    Some girl who'd recently popped out a sprog updated her facebook status to say something like "I wish people who don't have kids would stop giving people parenting advice" and I said something like "Just because someone's had unprotected sex doesn't mean they make a better parent!"

    So she flies off the handle and says wtf blah blah and deletes me from her friends list. Obviously she's got the wrong end of the stick so I message her back saying

    Hi dozeybiznitch (name changed to protect the ignorant), didn't mean that about you personally or anything, just that you get some people who think just because they've had a kid that they know what to do. Certainly not trying to say that about you though. Sorry if I offended you.

    Daniel
    I thought that was pretty reasonable considering what I was saying was pretty obvious and she'd flown off the handle.

    So she replies

    well i have taken it personally. we tried for darcy for 8 months... for for us any way it wasnt just un protected sex. im 26 & ian is 33!!!!! your the type of person i was on about
    it goes on for a little while longer and she says

    Well im struggling to see how you got me having a go at my sister in law on facebook to me or people i know having un protected sex because we are child abuser. what a sick and twisted mind you have. if i ever see that you write anythin else like that on any of our mutual friends wall i will be reporting you to the police
    At that point I reported her moronic messages to Facebook just so the whole stupid episode is on record somewhere. I mean wtf?
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    1,615
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    No, they don't. Will Self's views as expressed on Question Time last night were absolutely right, too.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...me/8550915.stm
    I don't think the public have a right to know the details, but I can see the merits of the home office or whoever saying whether he went back for a technical infringement or another violent crime. It'd at least let the public know if he is "rehabilitated" or not.

    Having said that, I do pretty much agree with what Will Self said.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I don't think it's in the public interest to know, but it gives the tabloids something to bleat on about until Gordon Brown's finished giving evidence to Chilcot. Nice to see the "hanging's too good for 'em" brigade out in force on the comment pages.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
    I don't think it's in the public interest to know, but it gives the tabloids something to bleat on about until Gordon Brown's finished giving evidence to Chilcot. Nice to see the "hanging's too good for 'em" brigade out in force on the comment pages.


    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by christophulus
    I don't think the public have a right to know the details, but I can see the merits of the home office or whoever saying whether he went back for a technical infringement or another violent crime. It'd at least let the public know if he is "rehabilitated" or not.
    What good does it do for us, the public, to know? I can't think of how it would affect me one way or the other, quite frankly.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    What good does it do for us, the public, to know? I can't think of how it would affect me one way or the other, quite frankly.
    I think people don't necessarily want to know as such, it's just that they don't want to not know. He could be around the corner from me, why should I be a proper parent and actually take care of my children? etc etc
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel
    I think people don't necessarily want to know as such, it's just that they don't want to not know.
    Precisely. People are utterly fascinated by this sort of thing, in a voyeuristic way rather than out of any genuine interest or concern.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •