Results 31 to 40 of 59
-
10th February 2010, 14:33 #31
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 2,961
- Like
- 0
- Liked 65 Times in 28 Posts
It's funny that third place is worth relatively more in the new system.
25/2.5=10
18/2.5=7.2
15/2.5=6
12/2.5=4.8
10/2.5=4
-
10th February 2010, 14:47 #32
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 3,750
- Like
- 471
- Liked 1,786 Times in 422 Posts
The most interesting thing is that positions from spot nr 6 are rewarded very highly. So, getting many points with superally becomes big problem.
Colins Crest = Möldri Mätas
-
10th February 2010, 16:28 #33
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 202
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This scoring system is pretty bad IMO. I like how rewarding it is to win, but second place really gets shafted. It'd be much better even if 2nd got 19 instead of 18.
-
10th February 2010, 17:00 #34
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Colchester, Essex, UK
- Posts
- 1,107
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by serial jeff
I dont like the fact that Slowson, Block, Villagra, Kimi will get that many points when they come back after super rally. I hope S2000 competitors are fast enough so those WRC's that come back after super rally dont have chances of getting so many points.
-
10th February 2010, 18:33 #35
I can predict Mikko crashing alot more this year on tarmac events like Spain, because loosing 7 points to the winner if he gets second place is almost like loosing the championship.
-
10th February 2010, 18:50 #36
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Welshpool, Wales
- Posts
- 124
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think is REALLY good news! I don't really want Loeb to win, but if he does, then fair play to him! And with points going down to 10th we'll see more privateers and Production/ S2000 cars in the points - which has got to be good for them and their sponsors!
-
10th February 2010, 19:14 #37
But if loeb retires and Hirvonen wins, Loeb will loose 25 point and possibly his championship lead in just one rally!
-
10th February 2010, 19:19 #38
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,522
- Like
- 7,835
- Liked 11,171 Times in 4,437 Posts
It doesn't matter if You loose 25 from 200 or 10 from 80 (both 8 wins). What matters is that in new system You need less than 4 victories to get those lost points back and in previous system You need 5 victories (in case Your opponent is always second).
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
10th February 2010, 19:24 #39
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Neerpelt, Belgium
- Posts
- 3,349
- Like
- 42
- Liked 34 Times in 18 Posts
Rautenbach should have 36 points instead of 9 last year.
I don't understand why the top 10 can score points now. In 2001 you could score points when you were in the top 6, now with very poor entry lists the driver can score points when he is in the top 10. Very strange.
-
10th February 2010, 19:35 #40
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Welshpool, Wales
- Posts
- 124
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wim_Impreza
To a sponsor points can often prove justification that your investment is paying off - and with less and less manufacturer rides out there, we need more sponsors willing to invest the kind of money required to do the WRC!
Tänak got 20 points closer to Evans, but as the main reason was a bad rally for Evans, I would say that Evans lost 20 points to Tänak, not Tänak gained. The point is, if the other one does not...
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...