Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Ca
    Posts
    2,239
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Post Nascar cuts race purses 10%

    A 10 percent pay cut? Welcome to the club
    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/...e=blount_terry

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    14,547
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Jonesi, I read that and I see now that the track owners cutting their ticket costs to get more people into the track just was repaid by taking it out of the teams/driver's pockets. Bruton and ISC are not going to take a hit on their bottom line if they can screw over the teams and this looks like what they have done.

    I don't think the teams will feel it in the way we all think, but maybe it may push a few weaker teams into starting and parking, or maybe it just made starting and parking almost unfeasible.

    I don't like it....ISC and Bruton Smith I am sure could have rode out this spell in the economy without a drastic 10% cut....
    "Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,406
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I was just about to post this story from Yahoo.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100129/...r_track_relief

    This is the part that blew my mind: "High-profile tracks like Daytona, Texas and Indianapolis pay a much higher sanctioning fee to NASCAR than smaller venues like Dover, Darlington and Martinsville — and the purses reflect that."

    I figured NASCAR and ISC had some kind of sweetheart deal where the Daytona 500's sanctioning fee is $1.

    And then this article shines a little more light onto the subject

    http://www.scenedaily.com/news/artic...pulations.html
    racing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
    9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Ca
    Posts
    2,239
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
    I was just about to post this story from Yahoo.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100129/...r_track_relief

    This is the part that blew my mind: "High-profile tracks like Daytona, Texas and Indianapolis pay a much higher sanctioning fee to NASCAR than smaller venues like Dover, Darlington and Martinsville — and the purses reflect that."

    I figured NASCAR and ISC had some kind of sweetheart deal where the Daytona 500's sanctioning fee is $1.

    And then this article shines a little more light onto the subject

    http://www.scenedaily.com/news/artic...pulations.html
    Those numbers jive with what I've seen. About $2.5-3mil of the purse is TV money. Although the money is going in different directions, Nascar sanction fee is about what the purse is. Which means the sanction fee for D500 is well over $10mil.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Posts
    5,927
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
    I was just about to post this story from Yahoo.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100129/...r_track_relief

    This is the part that blew my mind: "High-profile tracks like Daytona, Texas and Indianapolis pay a much higher sanctioning fee to NASCAR than smaller venues like Dover, Darlington and Martinsville — and the purses reflect that."

    I figured NASCAR and ISC had some kind of sweetheart deal where the Daytona 500's sanctioning fee is $1.

    And then this article shines a little more light onto the subject

    http://www.scenedaily.com/news/artic...pulations.html
    Hey, at ISC tracks it's mostly going from one France Family pocket to the other. It's best to keep the books straight.
    DVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Posts
    5,927
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Great article on the purse reduction issue by a highly regarded (by me anyway) motorsports journalist. Takes ISC and SMI to task with some pretty interesting financial data.

    http://nascar.speedtv.com/article/cu...nascar-tracks/
    DVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    14,547
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Roy
    Great article on the purse reduction issue by a highly regarded (by me anyway) motorsports journalist. Takes ISC and SMI to task with some pretty interesting financial data.

    http://nascar.speedtv.com/article/cu...nascar-tracks/
    I believe I eluded to that in my hunch in the second post. ISC and Bruton have been making money hand over fist for the last few years leading up to this recession. Now We have proof.

    So while they offered a cut in ticket prices on some seats, the reality is the teams are taking it in the shins. Yet they are the show. Gee...this almost reminds me of the kind of friction that Indycar teams had with USAC in 79 where the sanctioning body forgot who was actually putting on the show....

    It wont lead to that sort of rebellion, but I will say that owning a NASCAR race team sure is a lot harder and more perilous financially than owning the track. Yet I don't pay money to see Bruton Smith or Lesa Kennedy-France count it, I pay to see the cars on the track.
    "Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •