Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Nascar cuts race purses 10%
-
30th January 2010, 03:46 #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Somewhere in Ca
- Posts
- 2,239
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nascar cuts race purses 10%
A 10 percent pay cut? Welcome to the club
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/...e=blount_terry
-
30th January 2010, 06:42 #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Jonesi, I read that and I see now that the track owners cutting their ticket costs to get more people into the track just was repaid by taking it out of the teams/driver's pockets. Bruton and ISC are not going to take a hit on their bottom line if they can screw over the teams and this looks like what they have done.
I don't think the teams will feel it in the way we all think, but maybe it may push a few weaker teams into starting and parking, or maybe it just made starting and parking almost unfeasible.
I don't like it....ISC and Bruton Smith I am sure could have rode out this spell in the economy without a drastic 10% cut...."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
30th January 2010, 07:01 #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Quakertown, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 3,406
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was just about to post this story from Yahoo.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100129/...r_track_relief
This is the part that blew my mind: "High-profile tracks like Daytona, Texas and Indianapolis pay a much higher sanctioning fee to NASCAR than smaller venues like Dover, Darlington and Martinsville — and the purses reflect that."
I figured NASCAR and ISC had some kind of sweetheart deal where the Daytona 500's sanctioning fee is $1.
And then this article shines a little more light onto the subject
http://www.scenedaily.com/news/artic...pulations.htmlracing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd
-
30th January 2010, 10:16 #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Somewhere in Ca
- Posts
- 2,239
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
-
30th January 2010, 17:49 #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2000
- Location
- Lowest Common Denominator
- Posts
- 5,927
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by call_me_andrewDVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.
-
1st February 2010, 17:15 #6
- Join Date
- Jun 2000
- Location
- Lowest Common Denominator
- Posts
- 5,927
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great article on the purse reduction issue by a highly regarded (by me anyway) motorsports journalist. Takes ISC and SMI to task with some pretty interesting financial data.
http://nascar.speedtv.com/article/cu...nascar-tracks/DVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.
-
1st February 2010, 21:35 #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lee Roy
So while they offered a cut in ticket prices on some seats, the reality is the teams are taking it in the shins. Yet they are the show. Gee...this almost reminds me of the kind of friction that Indycar teams had with USAC in 79 where the sanctioning body forgot who was actually putting on the show....
It wont lead to that sort of rebellion, but I will say that owning a NASCAR race team sure is a lot harder and more perilous financially than owning the track. Yet I don't pay money to see Bruton Smith or Lesa Kennedy-France count it, I pay to see the cars on the track."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
It's not over until it's over. Other punctures or issues may come. Yesterday night it also looked very different than now just four stages later.
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...