Page 19 of 86 FirstFirst ... 917181920212969 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 852

Thread: R-Classes News

  1. #181
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    86
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

  2. #182
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,386
    Like
    2,008
    Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ProRally
    YES, the news is in :

    "RALLYING

    From January 2011 a new Group R4 category will be created. A kit, homologated by the manufacturers of current Group N cars, will be made available for these 2-litre turbo Group N cars to ensure they can remain competitive with the Super 2000 cars.

    But it does not say anything on what the kit can consist of, and limitations. So has the manufacturers been given more details then ?

    To increase competition and the spectacle in all FIA Rally Championship events, the WMSC has agreed to the principle of studying technical regulations which may potentially permit GT cars to compete in these events."
    This is perfect, but how long will they study for before they decide, are they aiming for 2012 ?
    The easy solution for GR N is to map them for E85 and that alone maybe match them with S2000.

  3. #183
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,098
    Like
    9,933
    Liked 16,097 Times in 6,986 Posts
    e85 would be good/cheap but i am aware that fia is not going to make it cheap.Motorsport industry needs money.Have a better look here....'''will be created. A kit, homologated by the manufacturers '''

  4. #184
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland
    The easy solution for GR N is to map them for E85 and that alone maybe match them with S2000.
    I don’t know how you can justify that. The N4 is behind S2000 in performance and by lowering the octane rate for N4 they will be even more behind. Lowering the octane rate means that you have lower the boost to prevent detonation, which means less power.
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  5. #185
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,515
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,165 Times in 4,434 Posts
    E85 has octane number 104 according to commonly used RON method.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  6. #186
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    A book I have says that MON 85 compares to RON 92. I don’t know if MON 85 is same as E85. To have RON 105, the MON would be 95. But I suppose you know better.
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  7. #187
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,515
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,165 Times in 4,434 Posts
    Racing gasoline is RON 102/MON 90. E85 is RON 104/MON 94.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  8. #188
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    Thanks Mirek. They’re both very close but I’m convinced that the racing fuel has better knock resistance and changing the fuel to E85 wont get the N4 par with S2000.
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  9. #189
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    7,892
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Is it true that no more S2000 homologations are being given by the FIA?

    ie to phase that category out?
    Nav

  10. #190
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,515
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,165 Times in 4,434 Posts
    No, they continue, only with new 1.6T engine. Otherwise rules are same.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •