Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 77
  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germantown, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    947
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Gents, please keep this thread going! The uber-dorky engineer in me is loving this.

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,845
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BoilerIMS
    Gents, please keep this thread going! The uber-dorky engineer in me is loving this.
    Dorks of the world unite!!

    Dyslexics of the world untie!!

    Sorry, hope that doesn't offend anyone, I just find it funny. :-)
    The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken

  3. #63
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck34
    Dorks of the world unite!!

    Dyslexics of the world untie!!

    Sorry, hope that doesn't offend anyone, I just find it funny. :-)

    Screw political correctness, it IS funny.

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,709
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck34
    The spring angle only applies to McPherson struts, I think? And then it really sort of acts like the motion ratio. To me at least I always think about motion ratio as sort of like taking the spring off, jacking the hub up by x amount, and measuring the displacement between spring perches. I would do this at a fairly fine resolution so that you can capture any non-linearities.




    The spring angle is illustrated above.

    There are lots of calculators where you put in D1,D2 and angles and or course with a rising rate suspension it as always, gets more complicated.


    rh
    "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    2,324
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoop-98




    The spring angle is illustrated above.

    There are lots of calculators where you put in D1,D2 and angles and or course with a rising rate suspension it as always, gets more complicated.


    rh
    The d1 d2 ratio and spring angle determine the actual spring rate(the actual rate of the spring itself) vs vehicle spring rate. The important ratio is upper A arm to lower A arm length which compensates for camber changes as the car rolls. In a McPherson strut suspension the spring/strut angle sort of acts the same way.
    God bless the whole World.

    \"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.\"
    President Dwight D. Eisenhower
    April 16, 1953

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,709
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PA Rick
    The d1 d2 ratio and spring angle determine the actual spring rate(the actual rate of the spring itself) vs vehicle spring rate. The important ratio is upper A arm to lower A arm length which compensates for camber changes as the car rolls. In a McPherson strut suspension the spring/strut angle sort of acts the same way.
    I would add that the angles are most important in controlling the camber curve. With the above illustration you can see that due to the angles the suspension will curve negative in compression and positive in extension.


    rh
    "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

  7. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,845
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoop-98




    The spring angle is illustrated above.

    There are lots of calculators where you put in D1,D2 and angles and or course with a rising rate suspension it as always, gets more complicated.


    rh
    I would have to look "under the hood" of your calculator, but I would suspect they use the D1, D2 to figure motion ratios. So perhaps I was a bit "sloppy" in my earlier explaination. I wasn't thinking about this type of suspension, I was thinking more along the lines of modern IndyCar/Sports car types with bell cranks, etc.
    The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,845
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PA Rick
    The d1 d2 ratio and spring angle determine the actual spring rate(the actual rate of the spring itself) vs vehicle spring rate. The important ratio is upper A arm to lower A arm length which compensates for camber changes as the car rolls. In a McPherson strut suspension the spring/strut angle sort of acts the same way.
    What you are talking about with teh upper/lower arm angles is called camber recovery. And in a strut suspension there is very little camber recovery. Since the upper arm is basically the body, the camber pretty much just "rolls over" with the body. There is a bit of recovery because of the angle of the lower arm/spring, but not much.
    The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken

  9. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,709
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck34
    I would have to look "under the hood" of your calculator, but I would suspect they use the D1, D2 to figure motion ratios. So perhaps I was a bit "sloppy" in my earlier explaination. I wasn't thinking about this type of suspension, I was thinking more along the lines of modern IndyCar/Sports car types with bell cranks, etc.
    If you wanna peek ;P



    rh
    "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

  10. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    4,709
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck34
    What you are talking about with teh upper/lower arm angles is called camber recovery. And in a strut suspension there is very little camber recovery. Since the upper arm is basically the body, the camber pretty much just "rolls over" with the body. There is a bit of recovery because of the angle of the lower arm/spring, but not much.
    The Key with a fixed mount strut suspension is that the lower arm be near parallel to the ground in full compression.



    Mustang Strut ======================Short/Long Arm

    I have always called this camber gain btw.

    rh
    "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •