Results 11 to 20 of 39
Thread: VW & Fiat in WRC
-
17th August 2009, 17:27 #11
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 817
- Like
- 4
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Helstar
-
17th August 2009, 18:35 #12
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 30
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helstar
But anyway, there is a certain point in having only limited number of teams in WRC. You have all seen what happens to tems that are not competive. They quit. If we could have four manu teams, and they all have their junior teams as Ford and Citroen have now, it would be well enough.
-
17th August 2009, 18:56 #13
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Franeker, The Netherlands
- Posts
- 2,947
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They should not limiting the numbers of manufactueres, they must limite the rules and keep them steady for many years and keep the costs low for the drivers and teams Make the cars availalble (including all the engineer stuff) and pricealble for everyone. Nobody wants to spend millions on a limited engineerd WRCar or be manipulated by the only 2 real teambosses.
Mercedes is providing/selling the engines to Brawn , but does not tell them to stay behind their 2 own drivers. So why should Ford keep their paying drivers on a leash? F1 has client teams beating factory teams.R.I.P. all WRC heroes
-
17th August 2009, 18:57 #14Originally Posted by f-cup
Originally Posted by Motorsportfun
-
17th August 2009, 20:01 #15
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 817
- Like
- 4
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Helstar
-
17th August 2009, 21:47 #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,822
- Like
- 1,474
- Liked 1,835 Times in 710 Posts
The comparison to Formula 1 is not entirely correct. Indeed there are only 5 (next year 4) street car maker teams in Formula 1. Next year there will still be 5 engine suppliers as Cosworth is returning as supplier to the new teams.
However there are (usually) 10 or more independent manufacturers in Formula 1 regardless of engine suppliers (except for Red Bull/Torro Rosso atm). Brawn GP is not like Stobart even if they get engines from Mercedes. They get engines, that's it, they have to design, build, improve their own car, Mercedes has no say in what drivers Brawn hires or cannot tell them to move over in races just because they supply engines and the same goes for all the other teams (Williams with Toyota, Red Bull with Renault etc).
The difference is that F1 teams such as Williams or Force India do not need to sell cars, they exist in order to race in F1 so except for cases where they go bankrupt or whatever they won't leave even if they are last because there is nowhere to go for them.
Back to WRC now, it has for a long time been dependent on official or semi-official Manufacturer (ie road car maker) involvement. I think you need at least 4 manufacturers not at most as that article says. Not only because there is more variety and possibly more competition but also if you loose one you don't loose 25% of your top competitors.
As for Superbike thats a very good example of something done right. There are currently 7 bike makers involved (although only 3 are consistently fighting at the top with Aprillia recently getting into the scrap) and there is talks of KTM joining as well. Also, not only are they running works teams they some also give bikes to customer teams. They can do this because the cost is very low and the bikes are modified street bikes so when you think about cost/return it is very good even if you don't win.
-
17th August 2009, 23:43 #17MJWGuest
Could this be the rumoured Scirocco? - I think VW are keen on Turbo engines, but the 1.4 litre is the main one for VAG group now as that is what is in the Audi A3. Talking of Audi there was some crazy whispers about Petter and Audi A3 last week. I didnt beleive it then and I still dont, - cant see Audi coming back somehow.
-
18th August 2009, 02:16 #18
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Bunbury, Australia
- Posts
- 124
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpooSH
I'm not saying go back to Group A but if we want a cost effective & competative championship the FIA needs to look that direction, if they don't care about the costs & want out & out excitment the WRCar is what they should be looking at (although the current cars reward point & shoot driving to much, we need some noise & sideways style back in the sport).Stephen
www.rallywa.com
-
18th August 2009, 08:23 #19
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Exmuhle.....
- Posts
- 5,297
- Like
- 2,619
- Liked 1,251 Times in 680 Posts
Originally Posted by MJW
Audi - Sportscars
VW - Dakar
Seat - Touring Cars
Skoda - Rallying
However, VW expressed an interest in WRC with a TDI Scirocco, but the car was too wide, and wouldn't be given a dispensation. When the VAGroup come knocking, you don't knock them back. Big mistake I think.
Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???
-
18th August 2009, 10:46 #20
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 1,027
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyRAC
Yes I fear so too, you just need to look at the new cost for tourists to get into Venice and when everyone sees the amount of money being made others will soon follow, and prices will go up. As...
[ERC] Rally Islas Canarias 2024