Quote Originally Posted by Lee Roy
Try reading again, I said no such thing.

You asked why the judge set aside the suspension in the hearing. That hearing was not the Trial, it was just a preliminary hearing, so therefore, Mayfield had not been "proven" to have done anything wrong in a court of law at that time.
No, it was a temporary injunction.
some quotes:

" U.S. District Court Judge Graham Mullen concluded the "likelihood of a false positive in this case is quite substantial." "
and
" (Mayfield lawyer) Diehl argued that federal guidelines allow an individual a 72-hour window to have an independent lab analyze a sealed backup sample. He said that when Aegis tested the backup "B" sample two days after the "A" sample came back positive, Mayfield lost any opportunity to challenge the results because the seal had been broken on the second sample.

NASCAR lawyer Paul Hendrick countered that argument, saying the governing body is a private company that does not need to follow the federal guidelines."
I don't even like Jeremy but give him a fair shake THEN suspend him.