Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,578
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    I've found a 1991 Benetton for sale in '91 spec which according to the spec sheet has a H box. So I'm sticking to my original suggestion of spa '92.

    http://www.race-cars.com/carsales
    All other opinions are wrong....

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,032
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
    92 looks sequential...there's no "gate" for the H pattern just a single lever - how would you move from gear to gear with a lever that only goes two directions? So i'd think 91 is more likely
    :champion: WRC3 championship, WRC4 championship, WRC4 PCWRC, WRC4 ERC
    Winner - TRD2 Bathurst:burnout:

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    75
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    a racing car doesnt actually need a gate for its h pattern shift. the gears are there in exactly the place youd expect to find them so theres no need for a gate - that only makes the shift width wider than is necesary for a pro racer.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    I was thinking it looked sequential because the lever has a pivot that looks like it only goes backwards and forwards... but looking at some pictures of some older cars like the '91 Benetton and some 80's cars, they look similar. Maybe the whole tube that the lever is mounted on rotates for the side-to-side movement across the "H-gate"?

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Cowtown, Canada
    Posts
    13,789
    Like
    25
    Liked 82 Times in 63 Posts
    Cripes, I can't imagine shifting gawd-knows-how-many times per lap without a gate hock:
    “If everything's under control, you're going too slow.” Mario Andretti

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    203
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Well, it was an 'H' here at Monza-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k4Y-uangHM

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by shazbot
    Well, it was an 'H' here at Monza-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k4Y-uangHM
    How can you tell? I only watched the first 3 minutes but I can't see the gearshift clearly in the video. Do they mention it on the voice-over?

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    203
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    They don't mention it,but H pattern and sequential shifts sound different. You can hear Schumacher shifting down a couple of gears (4th straight to 2nd for example) and knocking it into neutral entering the pits. When you've driven both types you get to know and feel the difference even from footage like this.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,607
    Like
    28
    Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
    Thanks I see it now, only one downshift going in to most of the corners. I am familiar with both types but the H pattern is a distant memory

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,526
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I can imagine that they might fit different gearchange mechanisms to the car for different races - an H-pattern at Monza for shifting down several gears at once, then a sequential at Spa or Monaco for ease of use and more time with hands on the wheel.
    Give Leon a kick and tell him to get to work!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •