Results 11 to 20 of 41
-
29th April 2009, 23:32 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 520
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by D-Type
-
29th April 2009, 23:33 #12Originally Posted by D-Type
I admit that I'll consider a company's products a little harder if they're a sponsor. I needed a TV set for the bedroom. So I looked really hard at LG. I've read good reviews on LG, and the fact that it's a sponsor was a plus. Samsung won out because of price and features though."Every generation's memory is exactly as long as its own experience." --John Kenneth Galbraith
-
29th April 2009, 23:34 #13
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 520
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Statto
-
30th April 2009, 09:16 #14
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 38,577
- Like
- 78
- Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
I'd be less concerned about the effects sponsorship had on the public but more the effect of being assosciated with tobacco products would have on Formula 1 if they still carried them.
Remember it wasn't so long ago we were being told that there would be a wholesale move away from Europe to countries which allowed tobacco advertising, and remember how the cars always looked quite different in certain races because of local laws.
It's good that those times are behind us.Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums
-
30th April 2009, 10:38 #15
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Leeds, England
- Posts
- 2,972
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark
But to be honest you're right on that one. I don't criticise F1 for getting rid of tobacco sponsorship - they had to, I'd rather criticise the corrupt and beaurocratic EU for treating us all like three year olds who can't think for themselves.
-
30th April 2009, 10:46 #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 980
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm an out of sight out of mind kind of person. So I'm for all this 'nanny state' stuff, where we have horrible pictures on packets, hiding the packets under the counter etc.
Unfortunately I smoke, but do think it is easier to not smoke with all of what happens in todays world, banning of smoking indoors, banning of advertising etc.
though I do think it is a hugely important part of F1, due to the symbolic cars during that era, which happened to be covered in tobacco advertising.
-
1st May 2009, 22:41 #17
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Posts
- 355
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StattoGood friends we have, Oh, good friends we have lost along the way
In this great future,
You can\'t forget your past
Bob Marley
-
1st May 2009, 22:58 #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Jag_Warrior
As for bans, anything that stops even a few people smoking is fine by me. Yes, people can make up their own minds, but the specific effects of the act of smoking on those who do not partake themselves makes this a bit different to alcohol, for instance, in my view.
-
2nd May 2009, 00:30 #19
I smoke. I smoke Marlboro, tried other brands, prefered this one. Had nothing to do with motorsport.
I was and a fan of Ferrari and Peugeot WRC). But I tell you surely I did not start smoking because them.
Sure maybe I'd be inclined to a buy a product from a sponsor of whatever team, but only if I was in the market for that product in the first place.
I like Red Bull
-
2nd May 2009, 00:58 #20
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 2,386
- Like
- 0
- Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
not sure what country's run what sort of anti smoking ads
but would you like to see something like this on the cars
VERSTAPPEN: ‘If I’d let Sainz past, dad would’ve kicked me in the nuts!’
Having just polished up my crystal ball, I'm quite sure that Adrian will........ Go to Haas for free, and with his talents bring the WCC to the team and WDC home for Nico Hulkenberg. Seeking...
F1 Guru Adrian Newey leave Redbull