Results 21 to 23 of 23
-
19th December 2008, 17:17 #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 64
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think F1 should speak with the folks @ NASCAR who are in the process of scaling down the number of cars allowed per team for exactly some of the same reasons that the fans are stating here - dominance for the "rich" teams just being one of the bigger ones that stands out the most.
I believe this is another case of - and I've heard it here on this board before - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Leave it alone.
Just my .02...
-
19th December 2008, 17:38 #22
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,416
- Like
- 498
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Originally Posted by Knock-on
I'm liking this idea more by the minute .
-
20th December 2008, 19:13 #23
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 6,084
- Like
- 0
- Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
If they want to cut costs and make it all equal, then go to one engine, one chassis and one team series..........with as many drivers who can put up the cash
and give out extra points and medals for passing cars and crashing out opponents without running oneself off the roadOnly the dead know the end of war. Plato:beer:
Tänak got 20 points closer to Evans, but as the main reason was a bad rally for Evans, I would say that Evans lost 20 points to Tänak, not Tänak gained. The point is, if the other one does not...
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...