Results 1 to 10 of 614

Threaded View

  1. 16th July 2017, 17:42 #11
    mknight
    mknight is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EstWRC View Post
    what were the reasons he was behind Lefebvre then when he was actually faster?

    https://www.ewrc-results.com/results...2017/?s=139528
    https://www.ewrc-results.com/leg/364...nd-2017/?leg=2
    https://www.ewrc-results.com/leg/364...nd-2017/?leg=3

    Leg 1, 1:30 ish lost due to damaged suspension with his off. (note time difference is 1:10)
    Leg 2, 2 off-road drives, 10-20s in total. (time difference 2.8s)
    Leg 3, 20s off in "Tanak's corner" (time difference 17s)
    All these are clearly documented and all are driver mistakes. So in the end Mikkelsen is slower, but to say he is "clearly behind" Lefevbre on speed does not really tell the whole story.

    If you want Lappi vs Hanninen in Portugal since I used it for comparison:
    Leg 1, Damaged Intercooler for Lappi, faster before
    Leg, 2, Lappi faster until spin and damage in last stage
    Last edited by mknight; 16th July 2017 at 17:53.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules