Results 11 to 18 of 18
-
29th November 2008, 11:45 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 6,410
- Like
- 0
- Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by V12The world according to Taki Inoue: https://mobile.twitter.com/takiinoue/st ... 7249326080
-
4th December 2008, 10:26 #12
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Leeds, England
- Posts
- 2,972
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wedge
-
4th December 2008, 10:37 #13
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Burscough, Lancashire
- Posts
- 214
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by PolePosition_1
but could you see michlien and goodyear coming back to F1???Jenson Button fan till i die
He Who Dares Wins :)
-
5th December 2008, 03:31 #14
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Kalimanjaro
- Posts
- 4,584
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tallgeese
-
5th December 2008, 19:52 #15
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 6,744
- Like
- 145
- Liked 209 Times in 165 Posts
The tyre war period was definetely interesting for me. Surely some teams were handicapped, but the form of different teams fluctuated from race-to-race more than it does now due to different tyre performances. For example in Hungary 2003 Ferrari managed to finish just 8th only to win the next race at Monza (surely two very different circuits too, but nowadays you wouldn't see such an enormous jump anyhow!). Such inconsistent form created an intense title fight. And of course the 1997 season was exciting, when Arrows, Stewart and Prost were at times mixing it with the big boys with the help of superior tyres - surely it was an enjoyable sight?! Also worth to mention the period, when Pirelli was competing and some underdog teams could really shine in qualifying with great one-lap spec tyres.
Anyway, I think in current economic climate a tyre war can't quite be afforded...
-
5th December 2008, 20:21 #16
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Leeds, England
- Posts
- 2,972
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I remember when the single tyre was first being mooted (after Indy 2005 I think), an Autosport correspondent, can't remember who exactly, said
"Tyre wars have saved more seasons than they have ruined."
I think that sums it up in a nutshell.
Agree that with the whole costs thing etc. it's even less feasible than before, but it wasn't an issue when the rule was announced back in 2006.
The cynic in me still thinks it was a political decision in order to publicly hang Michelin out to dry in the wake of Indy (let's face it, with their sporting culture they were never going to bid, and in any case they were never going to win it). There was no sporting (obviously), or commercial (at the time) sense behind the decision.
-
6th December 2008, 12:04 #17
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 6,410
- Like
- 0
- Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by jens
It's because we have an element of parity and none of this race within a race business where a tyre manufacturer dominated certain weekends.The world according to Taki Inoue: https://mobile.twitter.com/takiinoue/st ... 7249326080
-
6th December 2008, 13:55 #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 6,084
- Like
- 0
- Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
i would say right now, be glad you have one rather than none......
Only the dead know the end of war. Plato:beer:
Wet conditions. Portuguese Autosport brought something to the table... the WRC2 crews are using a WRC spec tyre that is harder than the spec Meeke and other CPR runners are using.
Portuguese Rally News