Results 161 to 170 of 202
-
8th November 2008, 06:28 #161
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 179
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzz Lightyear
Amazing that these times were found but I would ask to see this screen versus the same screen 1 lap before it.
I would like to compare the last 2 lap times of Glock. I still firmly believe you don't just lose 20 seconds (if you include the gap to Lewis at the finish line) on the last lap out of nowhere... but perhaps if he lost 10 seconds the lap before this case would be closed for me personally. That would be substantial proof that his car was falling off miserably (not just falling off miserably over the course of 1 lap).-Salut Gilles -Sebastien Loeb = Best Living Driver
-Planetf1.com SUCKS! -RIP Alan Kulwicki
-
8th November 2008, 06:37 #162
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 179
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bowers
Timo Glock's last 6 lap times:
Lap 66 1:17.992
Lap 67 1:18.897
Lap 68 1:18.816
Lap 69 1:18.688
Lap 70 1:28.041
Lap 71 1:44.731
Jarno Trulli's last 6 lap times:
Lap 66 1:19.113
Lap 67 1:20.528
Lap 68 1:20.188
Lap 69 1:22.428
Lap 70 1:33.539
Lap 71 1:44.800
As you can see there was a huge drop off in performance over not 1 lap, but infact 2 which would dispell a last lap slowdown from Glock...
this wont dispell the case by anymeans, but it shoots down the theory for me.
For all you morons that were having a go at me, I once again never stated I believed there was a conspiracy I was merely open to it possibly happening. And for all those who think conspiracy's can't happen... COME ON!-Salut Gilles -Sebastien Loeb = Best Living Driver
-Planetf1.com SUCKS! -RIP Alan Kulwicki
-
8th November 2008, 06:57 #163
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 179
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mickey T
http://www.crash.net/motorsport/f1/n...ers_debut.html
- The split times supplied on this thread previously were quite useless as it was based on the final lap only. To get a real sense of "Glock-gate" you'd need to ideally look at the split times from the previous laps times (I thought that was obvious, my bad). As you can see I found only unofficial lap times that favour the "non conspiracy" side of the argument.
- For the umpteenth time you have made the wrong assumption that I actually agreed there was a conspiracy, after I flat out told the forum I was entirely partial on the matter (a few times).
-fine you don't like Hamilton... just don't expect everyone to take Lewis winning as well as you and Massa have then
- So as I understand it, because you think you are so "superior" that you want to earn the special forum right to mock/ridicule other forum members and that it should be encouraged???
Perhaps it's time I give you a definition:
con搞e新cend (kŏn'dĭ-sěnd')
con搞e新cend搪d, con搞e新cend搏ng, con搞e新cends
1.To descend to the level of one considered inferior; lower oneself.
2.To deal with people in a patronizingly superior manner.
3.To write words closely followed by definitions of that word because you think people are too dumb to know what they mean (relax dude, we all have Google... it's ok)
Am I being condescending then?-Salut Gilles -Sebastien Loeb = Best Living Driver
-Planetf1.com SUCKS! -RIP Alan Kulwicki
-
8th November 2008, 07:11 #164
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 179
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ian McC
Hahaha that's pretty cool.-Salut Gilles -Sebastien Loeb = Best Living Driver
-Planetf1.com SUCKS! -RIP Alan Kulwicki
-
8th November 2008, 07:39 #165
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Can you believe this guy, anyone?
When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
8th November 2008, 07:48 #166
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Posts
- 2,377
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BDunnell"You can mop the blood up later." - R.A. Lafferty
-
8th November 2008, 09:19 #167
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 618
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bowers
the reason i included the word and the definition is that, for reasons best known to yourself and your agenda, your responses utterly ignored the word i actually used and replaced it with words that mean something entirely different.
one of two things might have happened:
you thought they meant the same thing, in which case you should be thanking me for taking the time out of a busy schedule to help broaden your limited understanding by appraising you of the actual meaning of the word "derision" and, therefore, its lack of relationship with the words you interpreted it to mean (ie, "booted off").
or you used the more-dramatic "booted off" in place of "derision" because it turned you from a conspiracy-chasing ignoramus into somebody unfairly slighted in an attempt to garner sympathy on these forums as somebody who'd been unfairly victimised.
i consider you extremely fairly victimised, with your own written evidence showing you to be a recidivist of motorsport and racing ignorance being the sole catalyst for it.
you have google to help you with definitions of big words you don't understand? and you didn't use it the first time around when you were trying to figure out what "derision" meant? Again, it doesn't make you a victim.the wise man does at once what the fool does finally - macchiavelli
-
8th November 2008, 09:25 #168
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 618
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bowers
Originally Posted by bowers
while you're googling through a dictionary, run this word through it...the wise man does at once what the fool does finally - macchiavelli
-
8th November 2008, 09:28 #169
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
He said open to. Why must every sentence on this forum be deconstructed and then used as evidence to say that someone said something they didn't intend to say? Yeah it could have been worded better but what do you want to have an argument about? What the OP actually meant to say or what you think the OP said?
I would say i'm open to the possibility that something happened. Perhaps fact was the wrong word to use but anyhoo time to move on.Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
8th November 2008, 09:57 #170
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
I don't understand why you guys even bother to continue with this silly argument. I think both Massa and Glock have stated their points and its time to believe them and move on.
When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
Prince Albert of Monaco seen dining in Cheshire village https://www.cheshire-live.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/prince-albert-monaco-seen-dining-29037408 Chris Ingram Rally - Dream big, work...
WRC2 news & rumors 2024