Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Roswell, GA, USA
    Posts
    1,087
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilf
    I assume you're talking about the current fuel. Corn derived ethanol is far from a solution to declining natural resources, since it requires a higher energy input to produce than it yields.
    Not that it really matters, but the current consensus is that corn-based ethanol production has about a 15% energy gain - that is, if you put in six units of petroleum energy in and you get about seven units out. Considering the amount of cropland and fertilizer needed, your conclusion that it is not a solution is 100% correct. The only biofuel that shows real promise would be an algae based biodiesel, and that's totally in the theory stage right now.
    "Risk sweetens everything" - Peter Revson (1939 - 1974)

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,443
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DBell
    Sure. Why didn't the IRL use this as an opportunity to at least say what general concepts they would like to see in the coming years in the form of technology come into the sport. Whether it be a KERS system, hybrid engines or whatever, show that someone in the series is thinking of a long term concept of how the IRL will develop.

    There is very little evidence that I've seen that suggest the IRL has a big picture plan on how they will make the series attractive to auto manufacturers. Going by current TV ratings and a downgraded TV package for the future, marketing value doesn't seem to be that attractive of an option at the moment. So it has to be something else to get a company like BMW, for example, motivated to make the financial commitment to join. Relevancy is becoming a large looming question mark for all of auto racing as the world changes. Some series like ALMS,LMS and F1 are addressing this issue. The IRL needs to at least show it's thinking about it. To me, the IRL going to a conference like this and putting out the information it did says they have no long term direction. For a the IRL, a series that desperately needs a couple of manufacturers to join in 2 years, this was a needlessly wasted opportunity. They can't afford this. They have to be on the ball at every opportunity to convince companies that this series is worth investing in.
    I agree with your concerns - but I am not sure the IRL needs to or can go as radical as ALMS - for one thing the ovals will not lend themselves to some of the technology and for another, I think the IRL is far too weak to demand a high level of investment in new technology from anyone - if they do a new formula and nobody comes to play they are absolutely finished... If ALMS creates a "green" niche and it falls on its face they can do what sports car racing always does when the manufacturers bolt - fall back on the GT series or older "prototypes" and muddle through a couple of seasons before they get it together again....

    Like I said, I totally agree with your concerns and with the fact that the IRL really missed a good opportunity to say something positive - even if it was spun in a different direction - but I am not convinced the ALMS plan is the right one for the IRL

    I would also like to note that I am not as big of a fan of manufacturer involvement as many people are - I think the manufacturers are a big reason why AOWR is in such dire straits now anyway teams got too used to big manufacturer subsidies and tobacco money and forgot how to run a team in a competitive business environment..... When those sources of funding dried up it really exacerbated the whole split...

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,063
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by indycool
    Agreed, Chris. The story itself seems to be a left-handed ootch to competitors to play with ALMS rather than the IRL...if that was, it's even off-topic, so how far off topic can we tell that ANYONE went.
    No. It was an invitation for series to share their strategic goals as they relate to new fuel technology, etc. Innovation is negligable when it comes to the IRL -- which explains why Nation was off point.

    Lord Drayson is very passionate about E85 fuel and the need to develop a compromise between food and energy lobbyists. Laying down a foundation to seek and develop ethanol/methanol fuels from sources other than edible grain would have gone a long way to bringing visibility where it belongs.

    The perception that the ICS runs 100% ethanol "as the cool thing to do" versus 100% methanol which has been the mainstay of US open wheel needs some explanation.
    LBGP: The Sound - The Spectacle. Racin' at its finest.

  4. #14
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DBell
    Going by current TV ratings and a downgraded TV package for the future, marketing value doesn't seem to be that attractive of an option at the moment.
    Characterizing it as a "downgrade" is a bit premature don't you think? "Questionable" might be a more precise. I am not excited about it since Time Warner Cable here doesn't carry it, but I am not ready to say it is a downgrade from the pathetic performance from ESPN and ABC.

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,443
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by indycool
    Agreed, Chris. The story itself seems to be a left-handed ootch to competitors to play with ALMS rather than the IRL...if that was, it's even off-topic, so how far off topic can we tell that ANYONE went.
    I didn't even get that out of it - just that Nation did what most politicos do when they don't have anything to say on a specific topic - they talk about something else and hope nobody notices.....

    I think the IRL and ALMS are taking divergent paths that offer different types of competitors different advantages and also offer some a chance to diversify so as to isolate themselves a little better from the vagaries of business.... I would imagine when teams have two programs the more profitable one supports the other and overtime they go back and forth between which is more profitable....

  6. #16
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by FormerFF
    Not that it really matters, but the current consensus is that corn-based ethanol production has about a 15% energy gain - that is, if you put in six units of petroleum energy in and you get about seven units out. Considering the amount of cropland and fertilizer needed, your conclusion that it is not a solution is 100% correct. The only biofuel that shows real promise would be an algae based biodiesel, and that's totally in the theory stage right now.
    And some of the biomass efforts arround switchgrass and other non crop, "weed like" plants.

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,063
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Not to address Spanish Language telecasts on VHF/UHF terrestrial stations is even more pathetic Gary.

    Quote Originally Posted by FormerFF
    The only biofuel that shows real promise would be an algae based biodiesel, and that's totally in the theory stage right now.
    The Bio-Medical field has been working on technology transfer of engineered enzymes for years. Only recently has there been heightened interest to apply it to creating methanol out of garbage economically.
    LBGP: The Sound - The Spectacle. Racin' at its finest.

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,191
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilf
    Originally Posted by Rex Monaco
    The official banner of the conference was:

    “Fuel economy and energy efficiency: How racing can deliver innovative solutions…fast!”

    I am anxious to hear how a radical chassis will deliver an innovative solution to the energy efficiency. ....
    I didn't post that at all. Who'd you get that quote from?
    "For 80 years this place has run on tradition. From today forward it will run as a business." - Tony George (Failed businessman)

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    8,384
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Well, the IRL is the only series using ethanol, which can be argued about all day (and is in high quarters) and it's meeting with manufacturers for future specs for its sport and a conclusion can certainly be drawn that manufacturers will be wanting to work on fuel conservation and that can be a part of the new specs. That's reasonable enough, and Nation apparently said so, on the topic itself. On the rest off topic that ALMS chose to put on its website, Indycars race on ovals, like at Indianapolis, from which the term Indycars come from, and evolutionary rather than revolutionary tends to indicate that the IRL isn't going to try some radical deal that could sink the series. Seems credible to me.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,191
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilf
    Why am I arguing with myself? Only the editor knows!!!
    Nevermind. I see.
    "For 80 years this place has run on tradition. From today forward it will run as a business." - Tony George (Failed businessman)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •