Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 102
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Max wins case against NOTW

    Being reported by BBC News now, full verdict expected soon.

    Let's see how long this thread lasts...
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Here we go:

    World motorsport boss Max Mosley has won a legal action against a Sunday newspaper that claimed he took part in a Nazi-style orgy with prostitutes.
    The High Court ruled the News of the World did breach Mr Mosley's privacy, awarding him £60,000 in damages.
    Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7523034.stm
    Autosport: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/69414
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    9,532
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Cool! Max deserved to win it.
    Formula 1

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,223
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    He's still a scumbag, that was involved in ilegal activities and has brought the FIA into disrepute with his actions........I hope he feels smug knowing the whole world knows what a corrupt sad little man he is, but then he probably enjoys being called that.........

    As for the NOTW I never liked the paper or their behaviour towards so many innocent members of public, but for once I wanted them to win. How much did max pay the powers at be.....
    Indy cars says bye to Sky. Yeah baby.......

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kent, near Brands Hatch
    Posts
    6,539
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Missing a few emails Max? (Mosely, not Thrust)

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4388875.ece

    Two faced hypocritical oik (probably).
    Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MAX_THRUST
    He's still a scumbag, that was involved in ilegal activities and has brought the FIA into disrepute with his actions........I hope he feels smug knowing the whole world knows what a corrupt sad little man he is, but then he probably enjoys being called that.........

    As for the NOTW I never liked the paper or their behaviour towards so many innocent members of public, but for once I wanted them to win. How much did max pay the powers at be.....
    Wait, you wanted them to win, even though it was a disgusting breach of privacy?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    This is the only fair outcome - including the damages, which thankfully haven't been inflated to a ridiculous degree. Hopefully, it will force the tabloids into curtailing some of their more dubious activities that are in no way connected to any public interest, but I doubt it.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
    The judge said in his ruling that there was no evidence of Nazi behaviour. “I decided that the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities (albeit unconventional) carried on between consenting adults on private property," said Mr Justice Eady.
    “I found that there was no evidence that the gathering on 28 March 2008 was intended to be an enactment of Nazi behaviour or adoption of any of its attitudes. Nor was it in fact. I see no genuine basis at all for the suggestion that the participants mocked the victims of the Holocaust."
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4388875.ece

    That's very clear, and given that MM's privacy has been invaded, it's the inevitable outcome.
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    Hopefully, it will force the tabloids into curtailing some of their more dubious activities that are in no way connected to any public interest, but I doubt it.
    I doubt that as well although this article suggests "the Mosley judgment further tips the scales in favour of greater privacy."
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    Hopefully, it will force the tabloids into curtailing some of their more dubious activities that are in no way connected to any public interest, but I doubt it.
    Probably not, £60K (plus whatever the costs were, possibly >100K) is a small price for the News of the World to pay for all the extra publicity and sales they'll have gained from this episode.

    Also Mosley is an expert in the legal system, what are the odds that a soap star or reality show contestant would be in the position to challenge a tabloid in the same way?
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •