Results 21 to 30 of 77
Thread: GM to Reduce NASCAR Funding
-
24th July 2008, 15:48 #21Originally Posted by Sparky1329Brian France is a violation of Section 12-1 (actions detrimental to stock car racing)
-
24th July 2008, 17:55 #22
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Poconos PA
- Posts
- 8,800
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by harvick#1"You win some, lose some, and wreck some." - Dale Earnhardt
-
24th July 2008, 19:19 #23
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,114
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the Big Three...
...are now suffering from the cumulative impact of their failure to focus on smaller car and powerplant engineering for the domestic US market, and their past failures with build quality and reliability.
I sat and watched the same process unfold in the UK in the 1970's and 1980's with the British volume car industry. After nearly 20 years of producing mediocre, over-priced vehicles, the industry got its act together in the 1980's. However, despite demonstrating much better reliability, the perception that British cars were unreliable was impossible to overcome in time to prevent loss of market share, which eventually drove the British manufacturers out of business or into the arms of foreign companies.
Ford, GM and Chrysler may not be able to survive in the medium-term. The debates about the roles of unions are really a sideshow, much like the debates about the roles of unions in the demise of the UK car companies. The bottom line was that in the UK, the companies produced over-priced sub-standard vehicles lacking in imagination, and that, more than any day-to-day union issues, was the major contributor to their demise.
The biggest mistake made here was when the Carter administration exempted light trucks from car fuel efficiency standards, which gave the auto manufacturers the ability to continue with their use of existing drivetrains and building methods. SUVs and trucks were a cash cow until fuel prices eliminated those models as major revenue sources. This is analagous to the airline business model, which for many years relied on business people paying high dollars for walk-up fares. Once the business folks realized that they could use Orbitz etc. just like anybody else, that business model became a quaint relic. Ditto the current Big Three business model for the US, which was based on older vehicle and drivetrain packages. They need to rapidly create smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles (which some of them could bring in from elsewhere in the world). It's adapt rapidly or die time.
-
24th July 2008, 23:00 #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Kyle Busch bandwagon
- Posts
- 33,192
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IMO, I think ...
If ANY of the (American) Big 3 (GM, Ford or Chrysler) reduce their participation in NASCAR ...
Toyota will eagerly pump in plenty of money & factory support to the abandoned teams
I understand that the sales by the (American) Big 3 are down ...
but now would be a bad time for them to implement cut-backs in NASCAR ...
IF ANY of the Big 3 fumble the ball, Toyota WILL pick it up & score big
(Toyota now has a strong hold in NASCAR, can Honda be far behind ?)2008 ESPN Stockcar Challenge MSF Champion :D
2007 Yahoo! Boogity Boogity Boogity Champion :D
-
25th July 2008, 05:25 #25
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Quakertown, Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 3,406
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Haulin'AssAndTurnin Left
20-30 years ago, Americans usually considered imported cars to be of lower quality. American brands knew this, so they decided to get lazy. They cut back on quality because they knew people would buy their cars because the name plate had good reputation. Now the tide has turned and they're playing catch-up. Ford has recently announced it's going to start selling some of it's European cars in the U.S., mostly as a reaction to rising fuel prices.racing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd
-
25th July 2008, 06:57 #26
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Somewhere in Ca
- Posts
- 2,239
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RaceFanStan
-
25th July 2008, 14:21 #27
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Poconos PA
- Posts
- 8,800
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jonesi"You win some, lose some, and wreck some." - Dale Earnhardt
-
25th July 2008, 14:33 #28Originally Posted by Sparky1329
I can, I'm union :Brian France is a violation of Section 12-1 (actions detrimental to stock car racing)
-
25th July 2008, 16:15 #29
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Poconos PA
- Posts
- 8,800
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by harvick#1"You win some, lose some, and wreck some." - Dale Earnhardt
-
25th July 2008, 17:12 #30
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 243
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To much marketing towards low mileage vehicles and not enough time to re-tool. Thanks to our fine congress (Pelosa and Reid) gas prices are through the roof. No one's touching trucks and SUV's. Ford and GM have to many eggs in that basket.
Look for some tight times with race teams. I think we reached our peak about to years ago, now it's time to trend down. Less spectators, less teams, less development dollars, less cars in the field and probably less races.
Given that the law says it is illegal to be anywhere on a closed road, unless you are specifically authorised to be there, and that not many years ago three irresponsible spectators died on the Jim...
British & Irish Championships...