Results 1 to 10 of 61
Thread: New engine changes for 2011
-
30th May 2008, 12:38 #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 10,143
- Like
- 2
- Liked 33 Times in 27 Posts
New engine changes for 2011
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/67824
Looks like a possible move from 3.4 L V8 engines and towards 4 or 6 cylinder turbo engines. Honda will supply present engines for the next few years, but want competition when changes come along.Defend mediocrity... because excelence is just too hard to achieve. :p
-
30th May 2008, 13:19 #2
Sounds sensible; I can't imagine too many manufacturers would want to enter with the current regulations, as they'd be on a hiding to nothing with Honda having so many more years or experience with the formula.
I'm sure a sensible new engine formula for 2011 that had significant potential for R&D would be attractive to several engine makers, particularly if the cost was a fraction of, say, F1 development.
-
30th May 2008, 13:23 #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 462
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2011? Ugh. That's a long wait...
I don't see how introducing 4 or 6 cylinder turbocharged engine equals environmentally concious racing. It seems to meet that engine manufacturers need to address two issues: using non-oil-based energy sources AND emitting fewer particulates and dangerous molecules into the atmosphere.
-
30th May 2008, 13:41 #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 605
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
So they'll have the new car in 2010 and new engine formula in 2011?
-
30th May 2008, 14:19 #5
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Danville, IN
- Posts
- 544
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When a similar thread a few months ago hit this topic, I suggested and still feel that the ICS should invite the manufacturers to a conference to see where the manufacturers are heading. If that means 4 cylinder diesels or electric motors, let the manufacturers drive the decision. Then write the rules to support that decision. The only way to get buy in from manufacturers is to show them how they win with their investment in racing. Advertising by its self is not good enough in today's economy. They need the series to be their testing grounds. The series needs more manufacturers. This can be a win for both sides.
Mad_Hatter makes a good point. Seems to be a conflict in dates.
-
30th May 2008, 14:22 #6
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 224
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by champcarray
Engine "downsizing" is one way for the US automakers to reach the new CAFE targets for fuel economy.
The idea is to give the consumer similar power and torque with a smaller turbo charged engine than a big v8.
-
30th May 2008, 14:26 #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mad_Hatter
-
30th May 2008, 15:19 #8Originally Posted by DBell
-
30th May 2008, 15:30 #9
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 438
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dataman1
Erik Berkman, president of HPD, located in Santa Clarita, CA. "...We are delighted by the League's decision to welcome automotive manufacturers to Indianapolis next month. We look forward to the continued growth of IndyCar racing, and potential participation by additional engine manufacturers."
As far as the chassis/engine timing, nothing is set in stone. I'm sure they'll be worked on hand in hand.
Cottman or someone has a lot of work cut out for them and I do not envy them. Imagine trying to work out specs with a few rival manufacturers, without anybody throwing a fit, and THEN making it happen with a chassis manufacturer and engine builders...all while making it as safe as the Dallara has proven to be. Oh yeah, and it has to be exciting on superspeedways, road courses, bullrings, and street courses.
I hope they have the right people on this.YOUR FAVORITE DRIVER...
is not half bad now that I think about it.
-
30th May 2008, 15:53 #10Originally Posted by usgrandprix
generic cialis 20 mg canada
FIA and Formula 1 have released...