Thread: new "Daytona Superbike" rules
-
27th June 2008, 12:48 #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 10,143
- Like
- 2
- Liked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Mad_Hatter
Don't be suprised to see some of these individuals showing up at ALMS races, doing some intelligence gathering on just how to run a successful road racing series that keeps a diverse number of manufacturers happy and supportive.Defend mediocrity... because excelence is just too hard to achieve. :p
-
27th June 2008, 14:42 #12
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 305
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
good news. i think that the new promoters should heald over to the uk straight away and benchmark the bsb to see how to successfully please sponsors, manufacturers and riders while maintaining a close, competitive national championship.
mmmmm, makes a nice sandwich. a nice sandwich.
-
30th June 2008, 00:39 #13
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 2,149
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
"However, the independent interests of the manufacturers call for a racing series that helps promote specific motorcycle brands."
The sort of "dictatorship" the Flaminis have in SBK is a good solution. Manufacturers can say their opinions but they don't take decisions. This is also how DMG wanted to run AMA. Their management approach seams right. unfortunately their rules arent
So the possibility is to have 2 American series. One irrelevant but well managed and one relevant but mismanagedI got my motorcycle jacket, but I'm walking all the time...
I suspect that if FIA continues down this route, then Hyundai won't need to develop a new car, because they won't be in the WRC> It really is a stupid strategy of the FIA to spend more money on...
WRC main class in 2025