WRC.com is good.

[GigiGalliNo1]

I still don't get sound on any of the vid's! Sucks so i don't bother! Rest of the site is fine but confusing at times! Perhaps a WAP or mobile wrc.com soon for those who have 3G phones and mobile internet? :d

[WRC2006]

After the last few years I would've thought that it could never be considered good, but this year they've certainly improved in some things.

I like all the free videos, and the way that they've already got videos of shakedown on the net.

I also like the way they have a map of the route available, and a way of getting live stage-end interviews for free (rally radio).

The only problem seems to be in the reliability of their splits etc, and if you were paying for that I would understand if you were angry.

Does anyone else agree with me here, that wrc.com is much better than last year?

Definetly I agree with you compared to what they were offering last years.

But as someone said above, they still have a lot of things to do. Some independent (or private) sites have got more accurate and updated information than wrc.com while it's the official site.

But they are in right direction.

[Tomi]

being the official site wrc.com is quite crap in my opinion, even our newspapers are more informative, in my opinion, http://www.rallye-magazin.de and http://www.mtv3.fi/urheilu/ralli/ are quite good.

[jonas_mcrae]

being the official site wrc.com is quite crap in my opinion, even our newspapers are more informative, in my opinion, http://www.rallye-magazin.de and http://www.mtv3.fi/urheilu/ralli/ are quite good.

No way those sites are better, they might be more reliable and no doubt good sites, but if you look at the WRC.com layout and content they really put some thought and budget into it, its well organized and you get a little bit of everything in little space, you dont have to scroll down like two or three pages to see everything as in http://www.rallye-magazin.de/. I love the videos not only during rallies but also some of the features they offer sometimes, like the history of different rally cars etc... they were good. And by the way all the people that complain about the self playing videos, loading and that stuff its just because they either lack the abilities to do a good configuration in their browsers and computers or don't have a good internet connection and they are angry about that LOL (if you have both and still complaining, well your computer must suck(or be a mac) or your just sad) Mine did not work at the beginning but after doing some configuration is great.

the only site that I like more even though I don't understand any Czech is ewrc.cz, its just amazing

[DonJippo]

being the official site wrc.com is quite crap in my opinion, even our newspapers are more informative, in my opinion, http://www.rallye-magazin.de and http://www.mtv3.fi/urheilu/ralli/ are quite good.

I'm also using those, very good sites

[AndyRAC]

being the official site wrc.com is quite crap in my opinion, even our newspapers are more informative, in my opinion, http://www.rallye-magazin.de and http://www.mtv3.fi/urheilu/ralli/ are quite good.

Well our papers aren't!!
What Rally? What WRC? Oh wait a minute, - 'obscure rally', 'a low key rally'. Even the BBC website just has a link to wrc.com, they don't bother themselves wasting time on a minority low interest sport!

[GigiGalliNo1]

Look! Look! They're playing old vids of the WRC..!!

[Alink2]

Andy RAC

Rally Results is doing about 40 pages of results and news about each WRC rally this year, plus IRC and ERC.

http://www.myrallyresults.com

[Leon]

Look! Look! They're playing old vids of the WRC..!!

Westerday I try to watch the san remo 1987 video only to discover it was actually the 1989 review

[J4MIE]

Well having upgraded my PC over recent weeks I finally got around to visiting wrc.com a few minutes ago. Now I can actually see the videos they look good....until it stutters to a halt because they are too big, and it just messes up completely.

Can't say that I haven't given them a chance but I won't be back............