Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    Exactly, besides the electronics are smart enough to recognise that and prevent the driver from doing it. It's pretty difficult to deliberately lunch an engine these days. And if the FIA know you've done it then you won't get a free engine change.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    2,822
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
    Maybe Kimi thought he was pressing the "launch" button, but in fact it was the "lunch" button.
    http://photos.spa-networks.co.uk/photos My photos (inc Santa Pod Easter Thunderball, April 2011)

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    15,233
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Even if you could lunch the engine by downshifting, you would wreck the gearbox which also has to last several races.

    Only thing you can do is turn down the wick as they did.

  4. #14
    Blimey, 20 Years Azumanga Davo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,089
    Like
    2
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wmcot
    How about the 2005 Bahrain GP?
    That's an oilfield, isn't it?

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carlow, Ireland
    Posts
    259
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    it was the 2004 bahrain gp kimi did that at.

    2005 Bahrain GP:
    1st: Fernando Alonso
    2nd: Jarno Trulli
    3rd: Kimi Raikkonen
    I didn't know chickens were capable of being vicious.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Tazio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    15,389
    Like
    1,117
    Liked 645 Times in 510 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/060420...me-alonso.html



    Why?

    I make reference to the 2005 German Grand Prix at the Nurburgring when Kimi deliberately jammed his foot to the floor and blew his engine to pieces to prove a point to the Mercedes people at their home GP (that the engine was crap and they needed to do better). The telemetry from the race shows Kimi's engine go to about 23,000 revs before it cataclysmically ate it itself.

    http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/rr743.html

    Actually he said something rude in English during the telecast.

    What's to stop someone tactically from doing likewise? If you had no chance of scoring points, wouldn't it make sense to score a fresh engine for the next race?
    If I was a dirver and I knew that the best I was going to do was come in 9th, then I'd deliberately find a way of braking engine just so I could exploit the rule.

    So why not?
    I just think it’s a tactical solution to having a fresher engine for the largest period of time you are in a position to score points. I don't necessarily agree with it. There was the chance that there could have been a SC situation. In that case they would fire that baby back up closer to its limit. Every time you change an engine, you are trying to get it to last 2 races. If each engine last's less than 2 (or even1) you’ve got problems. IMHO I think they should have run the engine the way they normally do, and if by the closing stages of the race Hamilton hadn't fought his way back into the points. Just drive it off the course, and start over again in Spain without a penalty.
    I don't agree with the decision.
    But Ron made it
    And, Ron’s a genius!
    May the forza be with you

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •